Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29769107›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2018

A pedometer-based walking intervention with and without email counseling in general practice: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Tomas Vetrovsky, Jozef Cupka, Martin Dudek, Blanka Kuthanova, Klaudia Vetrovska, Vaclav Capek, Vaclav Bunc

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03135561 (A Pedometer-based Walking Intervention With and Without Email Counselling in General Practice), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03135561 nacompletednot on this map

A Pedometer-based Walking Intervention With and Without Email Counselling in General Practice: a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharles University, Czech RepublicRan2015 to 2016Enrolled37ConditionsPhysical Activity, Primary Care, General PracticeArmspedometer-plus-email, pedometer-only
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Walking for hypertension.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Depression and Objectively Measured Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tomas VetrovskyFaculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Jose Martiho 31, 162 52, Prague 6, Czech Republic. tomas.vetrovsky@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2529-7069
Jozef CupkaMediciman s.r.o, Maxovska 1019/6, 155 00, Prague 5, Czech Republic.
Martin DudekLaureus s.r.o, Palackeho 541, 252 29, Dobrichovice, Czech Republic.
Blanka KuthanovaPraktici Praha 6, s.r.o, Vitezne namesti 817/9, 160 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Klaudia VetrovskaHumilitas s.r.o, Na Veselou 698/2, 266 01, Beroun, Czech Republic.
Vaclav CapekSecond Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, V Uvalu 84, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic.
Vaclav BuncFaculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Jose Martiho 31, 162 52, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZPRO.MED.CS Praha (Czechia) · CZ

Funding

Univerzita Karlova v Praze Progres Q41
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral practitioners play a fundamental role in combatting the current epidemic of physical inactivity, and pedometer-based walking interventions are able to increase physical activity levels of their patients. Supplementing these interventions with email counseling driven by feedback from the pedometer has the potential to further improve their effectiveness but it has to be yet confirmed in clinical trials. Therefore, the aim of our pilot randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the feasibility and potential efficacy of future trials designed to assess the additional benefit of email counseling added to a pedometer-based intervention in a primary care setting.

methodsPhysically inactive patients were opportunistically recruited from four general practices and randomized to a 12-week pedometer-based intervention with or without email counseling. To explore the feasibility of future trials, we assessed the speed and efficiency of recruitment, adherence to wearing the pedometer, and engagement with email counseling. To evaluate the potential efficacy, daily step-count was the primary outcome and blood pressure, waist and hip circumference, and body mass were the secondary outcomes. Additionally, we conducted a qualitative analysis of structured interviews with the participating general practitioners.

resultsThe opportunistic recruitment has been shown to be feasible and acceptable, but relatively slow and inefficient; moreover, general practitioners selectively recruited overweight and obese patients. Patients manifested high adherence, wearing the pedometer on 83% (± 20) of days. All patients from the counseling group actively participated in email communication and responded to 46% (± 22) of the emails they received. Both groups significantly increased their daily step-count (pedometer-plus-email, + 2119, p = 0.002; pedometer-alone, + 1336, p = 0.03), but the difference between groups was not significant (p = 0.18). When analyzing both groups combined, there was a significant decrease in body mass (- 0.68 kg, p = 0.04), waist circumference (- 1.73 cm, p = 0.03), and systolic blood pressure (- 3.48 mmHg, p = 0.045).

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that adding email counseling to a pedometer-based intervention in a primary care setting is feasible and might have the potential to increase the efficacy of such an intervention in increasing physical activity levels.

trial registrationThe trial was retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT03135561 , date: April 26, 2017).

Indexed as

General PracticeActigraphyAdultAgedCounselingElectronic MailFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProgram EvaluationWalkingAdherenceEmail counselingGeneral practitionerPedometerPhysical activityPrimary careQualitative researchRecruitmentWalking

Identifiers

PMID29769107
PMCPMC5956962
OpenAlexW2805007631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.