Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29768629›Full record

ReviewArchives of endocrinology and metabolism

Controversial issues in the management of hyperprolactinemia and prolactinomas - An overview by the Neuroendocrinology Department of the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism.

Lucio Vilar, Julio Abucham, José Luciano Albuquerque, Luiz Antônio Araujo, Monalisa F Azevedo, Cesar Luiz Boguszewski, Luiz Augusto Casulari, Malebranche B C Cunha Neto, Mauro A Czepielewski, Felipe H G Duarte and 15 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of endocrinology and metabolism. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Italian Guidelines for the Management of Prolactinomas.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2023
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Prolactinomas treated with dopaminergic agonists: behavior in different moments of life.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Hyperprolactinemia in women: treatment.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Hyperprolactinemia in women: diagnostic approach.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Lucio VilarServiço de Endocrinologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, PE, Brasil.
Julio AbuchamUnidade de Neuroendócrino, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp/EPM), São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
José Luciano AlbuquerqueServiço de Endocrinologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), Recife, PE, Brasil.
Luiz Antônio AraujoCentro de Endocrinologia e Diabetes de Joinville (Endoville), Joinville, SC, Brasil.
Monalisa F AzevedoServiço de Endocrinologia do Hospital Universitário de Brasília, Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Cesar Luiz BoguszewskiServiço de Endocrinologia e Metabologia, Hospital de Clínicas, Universidade Federal do Paraná (SEMPR), Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
Luiz Augusto CasulariServiço de Endocrinologia do Hospital Universitário de Brasília, Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Malebranche B C Cunha NetoDivisão de Neurocirurgia Funcional, Instituto de Psiquiatria do Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (IPq-HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Mauro A CzepielewskiServiço de Endocrinologia, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, PPG Endocrinologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Felipe H G DuarteServiço de Endocrinologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Manuel Dos S FariaServiço de Endocrinologia, Hospital Universitário Presidente Dutra, Universidade Federal do Maranhão (UFMA), São Luís, MA, Brasil.
Monica R GadelhaServiço de Endocrinologia, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (HUCFF-UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Heraldo M GarmesDepartamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (FCM/Unicamp), Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Andrea GlezerServiço de Endocrinologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Maria Helane GurgelServiço de Endocrinologia, Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio, Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFCE), Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.
Raquel S JalladServiço de Endocrinologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Manoel MartinsServiço de Endocrinologia, Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio, Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFCE), Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.
Paulo A C MirandaServiço de Endocrinologia e Metabologia, Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Renan M MontenegroServiço de Endocrinologia, Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio, Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFCE), Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.
Nina R C MusolinoDivisão de Neurocirurgia Funcional, Instituto de Psiquiatria do Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (IPq-HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Luciana A NavesServiço de Endocrinologia do Hospital Universitário de Brasília, Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasília, DF, Brasil.
Antônio Ribeiro-Oliveira JúniorServiço de Endocrinologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.
Cíntia M S SilvaServiço de Endocrinologia, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (HUCFF-UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Camila ViecceliServiço de Endocrinologia, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, PPG Endocrinologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Marcello D BronsteinServiço de Endocrinologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco · BRHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre · BRHospital Universitário Walter Cantídio · BRUniversidade de Brasília · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRGrupo Santa Casa de Belo Horizonte · BRHospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRHospital de Clínicas Universidade Federal do Paraná · BRHospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Maranhão · BRHospital Universitário de Brasília · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Federal de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal do Ceará · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prolactinomas are the most common pituitary adenomas (approximately 40% of cases), and they represent an important cause of hypogonadism and infertility in both sexes. The magnitude of prolactin (PRL) elevation can be useful in determining the etiology of hyperprolactinemia. Indeed, PRL levels > 250 ng/mL are highly suggestive of the presence of a prolactinoma. In contrast, most patients with stalk dysfunction, drug-induced hyperprolactinemia or systemic diseases present with PRL levels < 100 ng/mL. However, exceptions to these rules are not rare. On the other hand, among patients with macroprolactinomas (MACs), artificially low PRL levels may result from the so-called "hook effect". Patients harboring cystic MACs may also present with a mild PRL elevation. The screening for macroprolactin is mostly indicated for asymptomatic patients and those with apparent idiopathic hyperprolactinemia. Dopamine agonists (DAs) are the treatment of choice for prolactinomas, particularly cabergoline, which is more effective and better tolerated than bromocriptine. After 2 years of successful treatment, DA withdrawal should be considered in all cases of microprolactinomas and in selected cases of MACs. In this publication, the goal of the Neuroendocrinology Department of the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM) is to provide a review of the diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia and prolactinomas, emphasizing controversial issues regarding these topics. This review is based on data published in the literature and the authors' experience.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAntineoplastic AgentsBrazilBromocriptineCabergolineDopamine AgonistsErgolinesFemaleHumansHyperprolactinemiaMalePituitary NeoplasmsProlactinProlactinomaAntineoplastic AgentsBromocriptineCabergolineDopamine AgonistsErgolinesProlactin

Identifiers

PMID29768629
PMCPMC10118988
OpenAlexW2809316841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.