Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29768525›Full record

Trial reportJournal of applied oral science : revista FOB2018

Effects of a food enriched with probiotics on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus spp. salivary counts in preschool children: a cluster randomized trial.

Judy Villavicencio, Lina Maria Villegas, Maria Cristina Arango, Susana Arias, Francia Triana

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Effect of a Short-Term Intervention withInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Trial
  8. Effects of Oral Probiotics onDentistry journal · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Journal of oral microbiology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The Current Strategies in Controlling Oral Diseases by Herbal and Chemical Materials.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Review
  18. A Review of the Role of Probiotic Supplementation in Dental Caries.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2020
    Review
  19. Effects of a functional food supplemented with probiotics on biological factors related to dental caries in children: a pilot study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2020
    Article
  20. Evaluation of the Effect of ProbioticInternational journal of dentistry · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Judy VillavicencioEscuela de Odontología, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4390-589X
Lina Maria VillegasEscuela de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Maria Cristina ArangoEscuela de Odontología, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Susana AriasEscuela de Odontología, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Francia TrianaEscuela de Odontología, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Universidad del Valle · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotics have provided benefits to general health, but they are still insufficient to dental health. This study aimed to evaluate milk supplemented with probiotic bacteria and standard milk, measured by levels of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Lactobacillus spp., in 3-4-year-old children after 9 months of intervention. The study was a triple-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. The sample was composed of 363 preschoolers attending five child development centers in Cali, Colombia. They were randomized to two groups: children in the intervention group drank 200 mL of milk with Lactobacillus rhamnosus 5x106 and Bifidobacteruim longum 3x106, and children in the control group drank 200 mL of standard milk. Interventions occurred on weekdays and information was gathered through scheduled clinical examination. The primary result was the number of colony forming units (CFU) of S. mutans and Lactobacillus spp. in the saliva. Secondary results were dental caries, rated by the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS), dental plaque, pH, and salivary buffer capacity. The proportion of S. mutans was lower in the intervention group compared with the control group after 9 months; however, the differences did not reach statistical significance (p=0.173); on the other hand, statistically significant differences between groups were found in the CFU/mL of Lactobacillus spp. (p=0.002). There was not statistically significant difference in the prevalence of dental caries for both groups (p=0.767). Differences between groups were found in the salivary buffering capacity (p=0.000); neither salivary pH nor dental plaque were significantly different. Regular consumption of milk containing probiotics bacteria reduced CFU/mL of Lactobacillus spp. and increased salivary buffering capacity at 9 months of consumption.

Indexed as

AnimalsChild, PreschoolColony Count, MicrobialDental CariesDental PlaqueFemaleHumansLactobacillusMaleMilkProbioticsReproducibility of ResultsSalivaStatistics, NonparametricStreptococcus mutansTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID29768525
PMCPMC5958937
OpenAlexW2801526300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.