Trial reportPloS one2018
Faster clinical response to the onset of adverse events: A wearable metacognitive attention aid for nurse triage of clinical alarms.
Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Innovative Technologies: Optimizing Nursing Practice.Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN · 2026Article
- Context-Aware Alerting in Elderly Care Facilities: A Hybrid Framework Integrating LLM Reasoning with Rule-Based Logic.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Factors influencing patient safety competence among Chinese vocational nursing students: A mixed-methods study using COM-B model and theoretical domains framework.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Article
- Alarm fatigue and perceived stress among critical care nurses in the intensive care units: Palestinian perspectives.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- The effect of intelligent management interventions in intensive care units to reduce false alarms: An integrative review.International journal of nursing sciences · 2024Review
- Intensive care unit nurses' perceptions and practices regarding clinical alarms: A descriptive study.Nursing open · 2023Observational
- Mobile Health Applications in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review of the Reviews.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2023Article
- Acoustic Biotopes, Listeners and Sound-Induced Action: A Case Study of Operating Rooms.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Augmenting Critical Care Patient Monitoring Using Wearable Technology: Review of Usability and Human Factors.JMIR human factors · 2021Review
- Impact of Hospital Nurses' Perception on Clinical Alarms and Patient Safety Culture on Alarm Management Practice.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Lessons from the Glass Cockpit: Innovation in Alarm Systems to Support Cognitive Work.Biomedical instrumentation & technology · 2021Article
- Organizing Audible Alarm Sounds in the Hospital: A Card-Sorting Study.IEEE transactions on human-machine systems · 2020Article
- An exploratory clinical evaluation of a head-worn display based multiple-patient monitoring application: impact on supervising anesthesiologists' situation awareness.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2019Article
- Incorporating Observed Physiological Data to Personalize Pediatric Vital Sign Alarm Thresholds.Biomedical informatics insights · 2019Article
- Use of a smartwatch as a remote monitoring device during transport to, and inside, a computed tomography suite.Anaesthesia reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study evaluates the potential for improving patient safety by introducing a metacognitive attention aid that enables clinicians to more easily access and use existing alarm/alert information. It is hypothesized that this introduction will enable clinicians to easily triage alarm/alert events and quickly recognize emergent opportunities to adapt care delivery. The resulting faster response to clinically important alarms/alerts has the potential to prevent adverse events and reduce healthcare costs. MATERIALS AND
methodsA randomized within-subjects single-factor clinical experiment was conducted in a high-fidelity 20-bed simulated acute care hospital unit. Sixteen registered nurses, four at a time, cared for five simulated patients each. A two-part highly realistic clinical scenario was used that included representative: tasking; information; and alarms/alerts. The treatment condition introduced an integrated wearable attention aid that leveraged metacognition methods from proven military systems. The primary metric was time for nurses to respond to important alarms/alerts.
resultsUse of the wearable attention aid resulted in a median relative within-subject improvement for individual nurses of 118% (W = 183, p = 0.006). The top quarter of relative improvement was 3,303% faster (mean; 17.76 minutes reduced to 1.33). For all unit sessions, there was an overall 148% median faster response time to important alarms (8.12 minutes reduced to 3.27; U = 2.401, p = 0.016), with 153% median improvement in consistency across nurses (F = 11.670, p = 0.001). DISCUSSION AND
conclusionExisting device-centric alarm/alert notification solutions can require too much time and effort for nurses to access and understand. As a result, nurses may ignore alarms/alerts as they focus on other important work. There has been extensive research on reducing alarm frequency in healthcare. However, alarm safety remains a top problem. Empirical observations reported here highlight the potential of improving patient safety by supporting the meta-work of checking alarms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.