Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29768460›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

A guide to automated apoptosis detection: How to make sense of imaging flow cytometry data.

Dennis Pischel, Jörn H Buchbinder, Kai Sundmacher, Inna N Lavrik, Robert J Flassig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dennis PischelProcess Systems Engineering, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Jörn H BuchbinderTranslational Inflammation Research, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Kai SundmacherProcess Systems Engineering, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Inna N LavrikTranslational Inflammation Research, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Robert J FlassigProcess Systems Engineering, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7092-1046

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging flow cytometry is a powerful experimental technique combining the strength of microscopy and flow cytometry to enable high-throughput characterization of cell populations on a detailed microscopic scale. This approach has an increasing importance for distinguishing between different cellular phenotypes such as proliferation, cell division and cell death. In the course of undergoing these different pathways, each cell is characterized by a high amount of properties. This makes it hard to filter the most relevant information for cell state discrimination. The traditional methods for cell state discrimination rely on dye based two-dimensional gating strategies ignoring information that is hidden in the high-dimensional property space. In order to make use of the information ignored by the traditional methods, we present a simple and efficient approach to distinguish biological states within a cell population based on machine learning techniques. We demonstrate the advantages and drawbacks of filter techniques combined with different classification schemes. These techniques are illustrated with two case studies of apoptosis detection in HeLa cells. Thereby we highlight (i) the aptitude of imaging flow cytometry regarding automated, label-free cell state discrimination and (ii) pitfalls that are frequently encountered. Additionally a MATLAB script is provided, which gives further insight regarding the computational work presented in this study.

Indexed as

ApoptosisAnimalsFlow CytometryHeLa CellsHumans

Identifiers

PMID29768460
PMCPMC5955558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.