ArticlePloS one2018
A guide to automated apoptosis detection: How to make sense of imaging flow cytometry data.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning implementation strategy in imaging and impedance flow cytometry.Biomicrofluidics · 2023Review
- Recent Approaches to Design and Analysis of Electrical Impedance Systems for Single Cells Using Machine Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Machine learning-based approaches for identifying human blood cells harboring CRISPR-mediated fetal chromatin domain ablations.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Feature selection revisited in the single-cell era.Genome biology · 2021Review
- Article
- Cell morphology-based machine learning models for human cell state classification.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2021Article
- Effect of Electrolyte Concentration on Cell Sensing by Measuring Ionic Current Waveform through Micropores.Biosensors · 2021Article
- Dissecting Response to Cancer Immunotherapy by Applying Bayesian Network Analysis to Flow Cytometry Data.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Development of a high-throughput γ-H2AX assay based on imaging flow cytometry.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2019Article
- Molecular mechanism of antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.PloS one · 2019Article
- Quantitative single cell analysis uncovers the life/death decision in CD95 network.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- A guide to automated apoptosis detection: How to make sense of imaging flow cytometry data.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Imaging flow cytometry is a powerful experimental technique combining the strength of microscopy and flow cytometry to enable high-throughput characterization of cell populations on a detailed microscopic scale. This approach has an increasing importance for distinguishing between different cellular phenotypes such as proliferation, cell division and cell death. In the course of undergoing these different pathways, each cell is characterized by a high amount of properties. This makes it hard to filter the most relevant information for cell state discrimination. The traditional methods for cell state discrimination rely on dye based two-dimensional gating strategies ignoring information that is hidden in the high-dimensional property space. In order to make use of the information ignored by the traditional methods, we present a simple and efficient approach to distinguish biological states within a cell population based on machine learning techniques. We demonstrate the advantages and drawbacks of filter techniques combined with different classification schemes. These techniques are illustrated with two case studies of apoptosis detection in HeLa cells. Thereby we highlight (i) the aptitude of imaging flow cytometry regarding automated, label-free cell state discrimination and (ii) pitfalls that are frequently encountered. Additionally a MATLAB script is provided, which gives further insight regarding the computational work presented in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.