Observational studyMedicine2018
A retrospective study of alendronate for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis.
Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bone mineral density improves during 2 years of treatment with bisphosphonates in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021Observational
- Efficacy of alendronate for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2020Article
- Efficacy of vitamin D plus calcium with/without alendronate on bone metabolism in immunologic thrombocytopenic purpura patients with steroid treatment: Nine-month results of a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2019Article
- It is time for an organised, scientific approach to the application of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical studies and trials.Clinical rheumatology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective study assessed the effect of alendronate for treating patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).Eighty-six patients with AS were included in this retrospective study, and were divided into 2 groups. Forty-six patients in the intervention group received alendronate plus vitamin D (400 mg/day) and calcium (500 mg/day), while 40 patients in the control group received vitamin D and calcium only, the same dose as the intervention group. The primary outcome included bone densitometry. The secondary outcomes consisted of quality of life, measured by Ankylosing Spondylitis Quality of Life (ASQoL) questionnaire, disease activity, measured by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), and functional status, measured by Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), as well as the adverse events (AEs).At the end of 6-month treatment, patients in the intervention group were not superior to the patients in the control group in bone densitometry (hip, P = .47; lumbar, P = .53), quality of life (P = .32), disease activity (P = .39), and functional status (P = .41). Moreover, no significant differences in AEs were found between 2 groups.The results of the present study showed that alendronate can neither be used to treat bone loss, nor to enhance the quality of life, disease activity, and functional status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.