Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29767400›Full record

ArticleAdvances in health sciences education : theory and practice2018

Volumetric image interpretation in radiology: scroll behavior and cognitive processes.

Larissa den Boer, Marieke F van der Schaaf, Koen L Vincken, Chris P Mol, Bobby G Stuijfzand, Anouk van der Gijp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Larissa den BoerUtrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands. l.denboer@uu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2131-5709
Marieke F van der SchaafUtrecht University, Heidelberglaan 1, 3584 CS, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Koen L VinckenUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Chris P MolUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Bobby G StuijfzandUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Anouk van der GijpUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interpretation of medical images is a primary task for radiologists. Besides two-dimensional (2D) images, current imaging technologies allow for volumetric display of medical images. Whereas current radiology practice increasingly uses volumetric images, the majority of studies on medical image interpretation is conducted on 2D images. The current study aimed to gain deeper insight into the volumetric image interpretation process by examining this process in twenty radiology trainees who all completed four volumetric image cases. Two types of data were obtained concerning scroll behaviors and think-aloud data. Types of scroll behavior concerned oscillations, half runs, full runs, image manipulations, and interruptions. Think-aloud data were coded by a framework of knowledge and skills in radiology including three cognitive processes: perception, analysis, and synthesis. Relating scroll behavior to cognitive processes showed that oscillations and half runs coincided more often with analysis and synthesis than full runs, whereas full runs coincided more often with perception than oscillations and half runs. Interruptions were characterized by synthesis and image manipulations by perception. In addition, we investigated relations between cognitive processes and found an overall bottom-up way of reasoning with dynamic interactions between cognitive processes, especially between perception and analysis. In sum, our results highlight the dynamic interactions between these processes and the grounding of cognitive processes in scroll behavior. It suggests, that the types of scroll behavior are relevant to describe how radiologists interact with and manipulate volumetric images.

Indexed as

CognitionPerceptionUser-Computer InterfaceAdultClinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleRadiologyCognitive processesRadiologyScroll behaviorTraineesVolumetric image interpretation

Identifiers

PMID29767400
PMCPMC6132416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.