ArticleAdvances in health sciences education : theory and practice2018
Volumetric image interpretation in radiology: scroll behavior and cognitive processes.
Article in Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Webcam-based eye-tracking to measure visual expertise of medical students during online histology training.GMS journal for medical education · 2023Article
- Mandating Limits on Workload, Duty, and Speed in Radiology.Radiology · 2022Review
- Identification of gaze pattern and blind spots by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using an eye-tracking technique.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- The Search Patterns of Abdominal Imaging Subspecialists for Abdominal Computed Tomography: Toward a Foundational Pattern for New Radiology Residents.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2021Article
- Perceptual Learning of Appendicitis Diagnosis in Radiological Images.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- The Back Alleys and Dark Corners of Abdomen and Pelvis Computed Tomography: The Most Frequent Sites of Missed Findings in the Multiplanar Era.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2020Article
- Evaluation of a new e-learning framework for teaching nuclear medicine and radiology to undergraduate medical students.Acta radiologica open · 2019Article
- Eye Movements in Medical Image Perception: A Selective Review of Past, Present and Future.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Utilization of volumetric magnetic resonance imaging for baseline and surveillance imaging in Neuro-oncology.The British journal of radiology · 2019Article
- Analysis of Perceptual Expertise in Radiology - Current Knowledge and a New Perspective.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The interpretation of medical images is a primary task for radiologists. Besides two-dimensional (2D) images, current imaging technologies allow for volumetric display of medical images. Whereas current radiology practice increasingly uses volumetric images, the majority of studies on medical image interpretation is conducted on 2D images. The current study aimed to gain deeper insight into the volumetric image interpretation process by examining this process in twenty radiology trainees who all completed four volumetric image cases. Two types of data were obtained concerning scroll behaviors and think-aloud data. Types of scroll behavior concerned oscillations, half runs, full runs, image manipulations, and interruptions. Think-aloud data were coded by a framework of knowledge and skills in radiology including three cognitive processes: perception, analysis, and synthesis. Relating scroll behavior to cognitive processes showed that oscillations and half runs coincided more often with analysis and synthesis than full runs, whereas full runs coincided more often with perception than oscillations and half runs. Interruptions were characterized by synthesis and image manipulations by perception. In addition, we investigated relations between cognitive processes and found an overall bottom-up way of reasoning with dynamic interactions between cognitive processes, especially between perception and analysis. In sum, our results highlight the dynamic interactions between these processes and the grounding of cognitive processes in scroll behavior. It suggests, that the types of scroll behavior are relevant to describe how radiologists interact with and manipulate volumetric images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.