Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29767320›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2018

Post-hepatectomy liver failure after major hepatic surgery: not only size matters.

Ulrika Asenbaum, Klaus Kaczirek, Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah, Helmut Ringl, Christoph Schwarz, Fredrik Waneck, Fabian Fitschek, Christian Loewe, Richard Nolz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Gd-EOB-DTPA MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Consensus report from the 9European radiology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ulrika AsenbaumDepartment of Bio-medical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna - Vienna General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Klaus KaczirekDepartment of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna - Vienna General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Ahmed Ba-SsalamahDepartment of Bio-medical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna - Vienna General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Helmut RinglDepartment of Bio-medical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna - Vienna General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Christoph SchwarzDepartment of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna - Vienna General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Fredrik WaneckDepartment of Bio-medical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna - Vienna General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Fabian FitschekDepartment of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna - Vienna General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Christian LoeweDepartment of Bio-medical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna - Vienna General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Richard NolzDepartment of Bio-medical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna - Vienna General Hospital, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria. richard.nolz@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7030-5972
Vienna General Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the value of functional future liver remnant (functFLR) to established clinical and imaging variables in prediction of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) after major liver resection.

methodsThis retrospective, cross-sectional study included 62 patients, who underwent gadoxetic acid enhanced MRI and MDCT within 10 weeks prior to resection of ≥ 4 liver segments. Future liver remnant (FLR) was measured in MDCT using semi-automatic software. Relative liver enhancement for each FLR segment was calculated as the ratio of signal intensity of parenchyma before and 20 min after i.v. administration of gadoxetic acid and given as mean (remnantRLE). Established variables included indocyanine green clearance, FLR, proportion of FLR, weight-adapted FLR and remnantRLE. functFLR was calculated as FLR multiplied by remnantRLE and divided by patient's weight. The association of measured variables and PHLF was tested with univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis and receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves compared with the DeLong method.

resultsSixteen patients (25.8%) experienced PHLF. Univariate logistic regression identified FLR (p = 0.015), proportion of FLR (p = 0.004), weight-adapted FLR (p = 0.003), remnantRLE (p = 0.002) and functFLR (p = 0.002) to be significantly related to the probability of PHLF. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, a decreased functFLR was independently associated with the probability of PHLF (0.561; p = 0.002). Comparing ROC curves, functFLR showed a significantly higher area under the curve (0.904; p < 0.001) than established variables.

conclusionsfunctFLR seems to be superior to established variables in prediction of PHLF after major liver resection. KEY POINTS: • functFLR is a parameter combining volumetric and functional imaging information, derived from MDCT and gadoxetic acid enhanced MRI. • In comparison to other established methods, functFLR is superior in prediction of post-hepatectomy liver failure. • functFLR could help to improve patient selection prior major hepatic surgery.

Indexed as

HepatectomyAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGadolinium DTPAHumansIndocyanine GreenLiver FailureLiver Function TestsLiver NeoplasmsLogistic ModelsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsGadolinium DTPAgadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPAIndocyanine GreenGadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPAHepatectomyLiver failureLiver function testsMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID29767320
PMCPMC6182758
OpenAlexW2803826220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.