Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29767293›Full record

ArticlePediatric cardiology2018

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Fractional Shortening are Useful for the Prediction of the Therapeutic Response to Metoprolol in Children with Vasovagal Syncope.

Jingyuan Song, Hongxia Li, Yuli Wang, Ping Liu, Xueying Li, Chaoshu Tang, Hongfang Jin, Junbao Du

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Can pediatric vasovagal syncope be individually managed?World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jingyuan SongDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China.
Hongxia LiDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China.
Yuli WangDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China.
Ping LiuDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China.
Xueying LiDepartment of Medical Statistics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China.
Chaoshu TangDepartment of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Peking University Health Science Centre, Beijing, 100191, China.
Hongfang JinDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China. jinhongfang51@126.com.
Junbao DuDepartment of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China. junbaodu1@126.com.
Peking University · CNMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of China · CNPeking University First Hospital · CN

Funding

Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Major Project No. Z171100001017253, Beijing, China
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this manuscript was to explore if left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS) could predict the efficacy of metoprolol therapy on vasovagal syncope (VVS) in children. Forty-nine children, including 30 with VVS and 19 gender- and age-matched healthy controls, were included in the study. Metoprolol was prescribed to the VVS subjects. The clinical data were obtained during follow-up at 2 and 6 months. The results showed that LVEF and LVFS of responders were significantly higher than those of non-responders both at the 2-month follow-up (LVEF: 72.5 ± 3.2% vs. 64.6 ± 3.4%; LVFS: 40.9 ± 2.3% vs. 34.9 ± 2.9%), and at the 6-month follow-up (LVEF: 72.8 ± 2.8% vs. 65.5 ± 4.6%; LVFS: 41.1 ± 1.9% vs. 35.8 ± 3.6%). The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis demonstrated that 70.5% as a cutoff value of baseline LVEF yielded a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 100% in predicting the therapeutic effectiveness of metoprolol at 2 months. For baseline LVFS, 38.5% as a cutoff value yielded a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 90%. At the 6-month follow-up, the ROC analysis demonstrated that 70.5% as a cutoff value of baseline LVEF yielded a sensitivity of 81.3% and a specificity of 88.9% in the prediction of metoprolol efficacy. For baseline LVFS, 37.5% as a cutoff value yielded a sensitivity of 93.8% and a specificity of 66.7%. In conclusion, baseline LVEF and LVFS might be useful predictors of the efficacy of β-blocker therapy on VVS in children.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsCase-Control StudiesChildEchocardiography, Doppler, ColorFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMetoprololROC CurveStroke VolumeSyncope, VasovagalTreatment OutcomeVentricular Function, LeftAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsMetoprololChild and adolescentEchocardiographyMetoprololVasovagal syncope

Identifiers

PMID29767293
OpenAlexW2803832030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.