ArticleMolecular medicine reports2018
[Corrigendum] Inhibitory activity of apogossypol in human prostate cancer in vitro and in vivo.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An interested reader drew to the attention of the Editorial Board of Molecular Medicine Reports that certain data featured in the above paper had been published in 2014 in the same journal, in an article featuring several of the same authors [Zhang X, Hu X, Mu S, Zhan Y, An Q, Liu Z and Huang X: "Apogossypolone inhibits the proliferation of LNCaP cells in vitro and in vivo", Mol Med Rep 10: 1184‑1194, 2014]. Specifically, data in Fig. 2A of the above paper (the Apogossypol, 15 µmol/l data panel) had appeared in Fig. 3B, c in the 2014 paper. The authors responded to our original enquiry asking for an explanation concerning the data that had been shared between these papers, and confirmed that the inclusion of the same data in the two papers had occurred in error. Subsequently, they were able to identify the proper data for the affected figure of the above paper, and a corrected version of Fig. 2 is printed here. We apologize to the readership of the Journal for any inconvenience caused. [the original article was published in the Molecular Medicine Reports 11: 4142‑4148, 2015; DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2015.3326].
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.