ArticleThe British journal of dermatology2018
Nivolumab versus ipilimumab in the treatment of advanced melanoma: a critical appraisal: ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Wolchok JD, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R et al. Overall survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 2017; 377:1345-56.
Article in The British journal of dermatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04203095 (Dynamic Monitor of Serum Chromosomal Instability Detected by UCAD as a Surrogate Biomarker of Treatment Efficacy in PD1 Inhibitor Based Immunotherapy for Lung Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Dynamic Monitor of Serum Chromosomal Instability Detected by UCAD as a Surrogate Biomarker of Treatment Efficacy in PD1 Inhibitor Based Immunotherapy for Lung Cancer Patients
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fatty acid synthesis promotes mtDNA release via ETS1-mediated oligomerization of VDAC1 facilitating endothelial dysfunction in sepsis-induced lung injury.Cell death and differentiation · 2025Article
- CXCL1 and CXCL8: Reliable and feasible biomarkers differentiating intrapulmonary metastasis from multiple primary neoplasms in non-small cell lung cancers.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2025Article
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Pre-Transplant Hepatocellular Carcinoma Setting: A Glimpse Beyond the Liver.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Gut microbiota influences the efficiency of immune checkpoint inhibitors by modulating the immune system (Review).Oncology letters · 2024Review
- Immune-related lncRNAs signature and radiomics signature predict the prognosis and immune microenvironment of glioblastoma multiforme.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Prognostic value of four immune-related genes in lower-grade gliomas: a biomarker discovery study.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Review
- Tumor immunotherapies by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); the pros and cons.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2022Review
- Vitiligo-specific soluble biomarkers as early indicators of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic melanoma patients.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Iron oxide nanoparticles for immune cell labeling and cancer immunotherapy.Nanoscale horizons · 2021Review
- Mechanisms Driving Immune-Related Adverse Events in Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.Current cardiology reports · 2021Review
- An Immune-Related lncRNA Signature to Predict Survival In Glioma Patients.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2021Article
- [Advances in the study of programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand inhibitors in the treatment of late stage HCC].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2019Review
- Survival analysis of immune-related lncRNA in low-grade glioma.BMC cancer · 2019Article
- Trends in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: immune checkpoint blockade immunotherapy and related combination therapies.American journal of cancer research · 2019Review
- Monoclonal antibody therapy of solid tumors: clinical limitations and novel strategies to enhance treatment efficacy.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo show whether either nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab or nivolumab monotherapy vs. ipilimumab monotherapy extends overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in adults with previously untreated, advanced melanoma. SETTING AND
designThe trial was conducted at 137 sites in 21 countries. Randomization (n = 945; 1 : 1 : 1 ratio) was stratified according to metastasis stage, BRAF mutation status and programmed death ligand 1 status. STUDY EXPOSURE: Adults were randomized to one of the following: nivolumab plus ipilimumab every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab every 2 weeks; nivolumab every 2 weeks plus placebo; or ipilimumab every 3 weeks for four doses plus placebo. Treatment was continued until progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal. OUTCOMES: OS, PFS and objective response rate were determined. Patients were also assessed for adverse events. The primary end points of interest were OS and PFS, comparing either the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group or the nivolumab-only group with the patients treated with ipilimumab only.
resultsAt 3 years, the OS rates were 58%, 52% and 34% for the nivolumab plus ipilimumab, the nivolumab monotherapy and the ipilimumab monotherapy groups, respectively. For the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group, the median OS was not reached at the time of analysis. For the nivolumab-only group, the median OS was 37·6 months, and the ipilimumab-only group had a median OS of 19·9 months. The hazard ratio for death was 0·55 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·45-0·69; P < 0·001] comparing nivolumab plus ipilimumab with ipilimumab, and 0·65 (95% CI 0·53-0·80; P < 0·001) comparing nivolumab with ipilimumab. The PFS rates at 3 years were 39% for the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group, 32% for the nivolumab monotherapy group and 10% for the ipilimumab monotherapy group, with 95% CIs for the two nivolumab groups that did not overlap with that for ipilimumab alone.
conclusionsAmong patients with advanced melanoma, significantly longer OS and PFS occurred with the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab or with nivolumab alone compared with ipilimumab alone. Furthermore, survival outcomes favoured the nivolumab-containing groups over the ipilimumab group in subgroup analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29766492What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.