Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29766492›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of dermatology2018

Nivolumab versus ipilimumab in the treatment of advanced melanoma: a critical appraisal: ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Wolchok JD, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R et al. Overall survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 2017; 377:1345-56.

M T Wan, M E Ming

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of dermatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04203095 (Dynamic Monitor of Serum Chromosomal Instability Detected by UCAD as a Surrogate Biomarker of Treatment Efficacy in PD1 Inhibitor Based Immunotherapy for Lung Cancer Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04203095 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Dynamic Monitor of Serum Chromosomal Instability Detected by UCAD as a Surrogate Biomarker of Treatment Efficacy in PD1 Inhibitor Based Immunotherapy for Lung Cancer Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorShanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, ChinaRan2019 to 2021Enrolled40ConditionsLung CancerArmsthe level of plasma cfDNA CINs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. [Advances in the study of programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand inhibitors in the treatment of late stage HCC].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M T WanDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A.
M E MingDepartment of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo show whether either nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab or nivolumab monotherapy vs. ipilimumab monotherapy extends overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in adults with previously untreated, advanced melanoma. SETTING AND

designThe trial was conducted at 137 sites in 21 countries. Randomization (n = 945; 1 : 1 : 1 ratio) was stratified according to metastasis stage, BRAF mutation status and programmed death ligand 1 status. STUDY EXPOSURE: Adults were randomized to one of the following: nivolumab plus ipilimumab every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab every 2 weeks; nivolumab every 2 weeks plus placebo; or ipilimumab every 3 weeks for four doses plus placebo. Treatment was continued until progression, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal. OUTCOMES: OS, PFS and objective response rate were determined. Patients were also assessed for adverse events. The primary end points of interest were OS and PFS, comparing either the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group or the nivolumab-only group with the patients treated with ipilimumab only.

resultsAt 3 years, the OS rates were 58%, 52% and 34% for the nivolumab plus ipilimumab, the nivolumab monotherapy and the ipilimumab monotherapy groups, respectively. For the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group, the median OS was not reached at the time of analysis. For the nivolumab-only group, the median OS was 37·6 months, and the ipilimumab-only group had a median OS of 19·9 months. The hazard ratio for death was 0·55 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·45-0·69; P < 0·001] comparing nivolumab plus ipilimumab with ipilimumab, and 0·65 (95% CI 0·53-0·80; P < 0·001) comparing nivolumab with ipilimumab. The PFS rates at 3 years were 39% for the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group, 32% for the nivolumab monotherapy group and 10% for the ipilimumab monotherapy group, with 95% CIs for the two nivolumab groups that did not overlap with that for ipilimumab alone.

conclusionsAmong patients with advanced melanoma, significantly longer OS and PFS occurred with the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab or with nivolumab alone compared with ipilimumab alone. Furthermore, survival outcomes favoured the nivolumab-containing groups over the ipilimumab group in subgroup analyses.

Indexed as

MelanomaNivolumabAdultAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansIpilimumabAntibodies, MonoclonalIpilimumabNivolumab

Identifiers

PMID29766492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.