Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29766487›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2018

Inhaled corticosteroids for bronchiectasis.

Nitin Kapur, Helen L Petsky, Scott Bell, John Kolbe, Anne B Chang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Inhaled Corticosteroid Use and Risk ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Inhaled Corticosteroids and Risk ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Asthma and respiratory comorbidities.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2025
    Review
  11. Infection and the microbiome in bronchiectasis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Insights into Personalised Medicine in Bronchiectasis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Nitin KapurDepartment of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Children's Health Queensland, Lady Cilento Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Helen L Petsky
Scott Bell
John Kolbe
Anne B Chang
Charles Darwin University · AUGriffith University · AUPrince Charles Hospital · AUUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBronchiectasis is being increasingly diagnosed and recognised as an important contributor to chronic lung disease in both adults and children in high- and low-income countries. It is characterised by irreversible dilatation of airways and is generally associated with airway inflammation and chronic bacterial infection. Medical management largely aims to reduce morbidity by controlling the symptoms, reduce exacerbation frequency, improve quality of life and prevent the progression of bronchiectasis. This is an update of a review first published in 2000.

objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in children and adults with stable state bronchiectasis, specifically to assess whether the use of ICS: (1) reduces the severity and frequency of acute respiratory exacerbations; or (2) affects long-term pulmonary function decline. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cochrane Airways Group Register of trials, MEDLINE and Embase databases. We ran the latest literature search in June 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ICS with a placebo or no medication. We included children and adults with clinical or radiographic evidence of bronchiectasis, but excluded people with cystic fibrosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We reviewed search results against predetermined criteria for inclusion. In this update, two independent review authors assessed methodological quality and risk of bias in trials using established criteria and extracted data using standard pro forma. We analysed treatment as 'treatment received' and performed sensitivity analyses. MAIN

resultsThe review included seven studies, involving 380 adults. Of the 380 randomised participants, 348 completed the studies.Due to differences in outcomes reported among the seven studies, we could only perform limited meta-analysis for both the short-term ICS use (6 months or less) and the longer-term ICS use (> 6 months).During stable state in the short-term group (ICS for 6 months or less), based on the two studies from which data could be included, there were no significant differences from baseline values in the forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV AUTHORS'

conclusionsThis updated review indicates that there is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of ICS in adults with stable state bronchiectasis. Further, we cannot draw any conclusion for the use of ICS in adults during an acute exacerbation or in children (for any state), as there were no studies.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdultAndrostadienesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBeclomethasoneBronchiectasisDisease ProgressionFluticasoneForced Expiratory VolumeHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiratory Function TestsVital CapacityAdrenal Cortex HormonesAndrostadienesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBeclomethasoneFluticasone

Identifiers

PMID29766487
PMCPMC6494510
OpenAlexW2804492408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.