Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29766458›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2018

Cerebellar-Stimulation Evoked Prefrontal Electrical Synchrony Is Modulated by GABA.

Xiaoming Du, Laura M Rowland, Ann Summerfelt, Fow-Sen Choa, George F Wittenberg, Krista Wisner, Andrea Wijtenburg, Joshua Chiappelli, Peter Kochunov, L Elliot Hong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Neural effects of TMS trains on the human prefrontal cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Assessing CBI with TMS-EEG.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Non-invasive Brain Stimulation of the Cerebellum in Emotion.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xiaoming DuMaryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, P.O. Box 21247, Baltimore, MD, 21228, USA. xdu@som.umaryland.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7206-5282
Laura M RowlandMaryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, P.O. Box 21247, Baltimore, MD, 21228, USA.
Ann SummerfeltMaryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, P.O. Box 21247, Baltimore, MD, 21228, USA.
Fow-Sen ChoaDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA.
George F WittenbergDepartment of Neurology, Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Internal Medicine, Older Americans Independence Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Krista WisnerMaryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, P.O. Box 21247, Baltimore, MD, 21228, USA.
Andrea WijtenburgMaryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, P.O. Box 21247, Baltimore, MD, 21228, USA.
Joshua ChiappelliMaryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, P.O. Box 21247, Baltimore, MD, 21228, USA.
Peter KochunovMaryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, P.O. Box 21247, Baltimore, MD, 21228, USA.
L Elliot HongMaryland Psychiatric Research Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, P.O. Box 21247, Baltimore, MD, 21228, USA.

Funding

The Effects of Kynurenine Aminotransferase Inhibition in People with SchizophreniaP50MH103222 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI BUCHANAN, ROBERT W · 2014 to 2023
$25.2M
SOLAR-Eclipse Computational Tools for Imaging GeneticsR01EB015611 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI KOCHUNOV, PETER V. · 2012 to 2024
$5.0M
Multidisciplinary Schizophrenia Research TrainingT32MH067533 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI CARPENTER, WILLIAM T., ELMER, GREGORY I · 2004 to 2025
$4.3M
Amish Connectome Project on Mental IllnessU01MH108148 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI HONG, L ELLIOT ELLIOT, KOCHUNOV, PETER V. · 2015 to 2018
$4.3M
Neural Oscillatory Biomarkers for Genetics and Animal Models of SchizophreniaR01MH085646 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI HONG, L ELLIOT ELLIOT · 2010 to 2013
$2.2M
The Role of Stress-Immune-Connectome Disruption in Mechanisms of Chinese Early Schizophrenia SpectrumR01MH112180 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI HONG, L ELLIOT ELLIOT · 2017 to 2021
$1.0M
National Institutes of Health MH067533National Institutes of Health MH085646National Institutes of Health MH103222National Institutes of Health MH108148NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB015611NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH103222NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085646NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112180NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH067533NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH108148State of Maryland contract M00B6400091the Clare E. Forbes Trust private philanthropic donation from the Clare E. Forbes Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebellar-prefrontal connectivity has been recognized as important for behaviors ranging from motor coordination to cognition. Many of these behaviors are known to involve excitatory or inhibitory modulations from the prefrontal cortex. We used cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) to probe cerebellar-evoked electrical activity in prefrontal cortical areas and used magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) measures of prefrontal GABA and glutamate levels to determine if they are correlated with those potentials. Cerebellar-evoked bilateral prefrontal synchrony in the theta to gamma frequency range showed patterns that reflect strong GABAergic inhibitory function (r = - 0.66, p = 0.002). Stimulation of prefrontal areas evoked bilateral prefrontal synchrony in the theta to low beta frequency range that reflected, conversely, glutamatergic excitatory function (r = 0.66, p = 0.002) and GABAergic inhibitory function (r = - 0.65, p = 0.002). Cerebellar-evoked prefrontal synchronization had opposite associations with cognition and motor coordination: it was positively associated with working memory performance (r = 0.57, p = 0.008) but negatively associated with coordinated motor function as measured by rapid finger tapping (r = - 0.59, p = 0.006). The results suggest a relationship between regional GABA levels and interregional effects on synchrony. Stronger cerebellar-evoked prefrontal synchrony was associated with better working memory but surprisingly worse motor coordination, which suggests competing effects for motor activity and cognition. The data supports the use of a TMS-EEG-MRS approach to study the neurochemical basis of large-scale oscillations modulated by the cerebellar-prefrontal connectivity.

Indexed as

AdultBeta RhythmCerebellumCortical SynchronizationElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleFingersgamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlutamic AcidHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleMemory, Short-TermMiddle Agedgamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlutamic AcidCerebellar-frontalCerebellumEEGMRSOscillationTMS

Identifiers

PMID29766458
PMCPMC6237666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.