Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29766450›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2018

Metrical congruency and kinematic familiarity facilitate temporal binding between musical and dance rhythms.

Yi-Huang Su

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yi-Huang SuDepartment of Movement Science, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauche-Ring 62, 80992, Munich, Germany. yihuang.su@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2660-9183

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although music and dance are often experienced simultaneously, it is unclear what modulates their perceptual integration. This study investigated how two factors related to music-dance correspondences influenced audiovisual binding of their rhythms: the metrical match between the music and dance, and the kinematic familiarity of the dance movement. Participants watched a point-light figure dancing synchronously to a triple-meter rhythm that they heard in parallel, whereby the dance communicated a triple (congruent) or a duple (incongruent) visual meter. The movement was either the participant's own or that of another participant. Participants attended to both streams while detecting a temporal perturbation in the auditory beat. The results showed lower sensitivity to the auditory deviant when the visual dance was metrically congruent to the auditory rhythm and when the movement was the participant's own. This indicated stronger audiovisual binding and a more coherent bimodal rhythm in these conditions, thus making a slight auditory deviant less noticeable. Moreover, binding in the metrically incongruent condition involving self-generated visual stimuli was correlated with self-recognition of the movement, suggesting that action simulation mediates the perceived coherence between one's own movement and a mismatching auditory rhythm. Overall, the mechanisms of rhythm perception and action simulation could inform the perceived compatibility between music and dance, thus modulating the temporal integration of these audiovisual stimuli.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionVisual PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaDancingFemaleHumansMaleMusicPhotic StimulationRecognition, PsychologySelf ConceptYoung AdultAgencyAudiovisualDanceKinematicsMultisensory perceptionMusicRhythm

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.