Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29766411›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2019

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors Risk of Recurrence Stratification by Tumor Volume is a Best Predictor Compared with Risk Based on Mitosis and Tumor Size.

Leonardo S Lino-Silva, Patricia Segales-Rojas, Eduardo Aguilar-Cruz, Rosa A Salcedo-Hernández, César Zepeda-Najar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leonardo S Lino-SilvaSurgical Pathology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico. saul.lino.sil@gmail.com.
Patricia Segales-RojasSurgical Pathology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Eduardo Aguilar-CruzAnatomic Pathology, Gastrointestinal Pathology Division, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología de México (Mexico's National Cancer Institute), Av. San Fernando # 22, Sección XVI, Tlalpan, 14080, Mexico City, Mexico.
Rosa A Salcedo-HernándezSurgical Oncology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
César Zepeda-NajarSurgical Oncology, Hospital Ángeles Tijuana, Tijuana, Baja California Norte, Mexico.
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología · MXUniversidad de Tijuana · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) have the potential to recur and metastasize. Several prognostic schemes have been developed, mostly based on the mitotic count, diameter, and tumor site. However, these systems are not precise enough. The research question was whether the tumor size determined by volumetry allows a better risk stratification than the traditional system, and our aim was to determine the value of tumor volumetry, a feasible and simple parameter, in the recurrence of GIST.

methodsSeventy-four cases of GIST were studied. The cases presented with non-metastatic disease, which were resected and did not receive imatinib. We compared the clinico-pathologic features of the cases with recurrence against those with non-recurrence and compared the tumor volumetry against the classification system based on tumor size and mitosis.

resultsThe median age was 58 years (range: 25 to 91 years). Half of the cases were presented in the stomach. The tumor size had a median of 8 cm (range of 1-30 cm). The median mitosis count for 50 HPF was 4 (range 0-92). During the period of study, 16 (21.6%) patients suffered recurrence. The significant differences were that patients with recurrence accounted for more deaths and the follow-up period was larger. The area under the curve (AUC) of the volumetry classification was superior to the AUC of the classification system based on tumor size and mitosis (NIH-criteria) (p = .05).

conclusionTumor volumetry calculated in the surgical specimen and/or pre-operative tomography was superior to the NIH consensus in stratifying the risk of recurrence in GIST.

Indexed as

MitosisTumor BurdenAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastrointestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRisk AssessmentROC CurveCancerGastrointestinal stromal tumorsGISTRecurrenceVolumetry

Identifiers

PMID29766411
OpenAlexW2803120094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.