Trial reportWorld journal of urology2018
A randomized controlled trial evaluating sildenafil citrate in relieving ureteral stent-related symptoms.
Trial report in World journal of urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02345980 (A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Sildenafil Citrate in Relieving Ureteral Stent Related Symptoms), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Sildenafil Citrate in Relieving Ureteral Stent Related Symptoms
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complications and symptom burden of ureteral double-J stents: a systematic review of prevalence, risk factors, and management strategies.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Role of phosphodiesterase inhibitors in stent-related symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2020Pooled it
- Effect of theophylline on stent-related symptoms in patients undergoing Double-J ureteral stent insertion: a randomized controlled trial.International urology and nephrology · 2024Trial
- Vardenafil and Tamsulosin in the Management of Ureteral Stent-Related Symptoms: A Prospective Comparative Study.Urology research & practice · 2025Article
- Evaluation of tolerance towards ureteral double-J-stents in children: an unmet need.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Observational
- Pharmacological treatment of bladder stent symptoms.Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.) · 2024Review
- A preliminary study on the role of Bacteroides fragilis in stent encrustation.World journal of urology · 2021Article
- Role of phosphodiesterase inhibitors in stent-related symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2020Article
- Strategies to Improve Patient Outcomes and QOL: Current Complications of the Design and Placements of Ureteric Stents.Research and reports in urology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the role of sildenafil in relieving ureteral stent symptoms. PATIENTS AND
methodsA randomized controlled trial was conducted between March 2014 and November 2016. It included adult men who underwent unilateral ureteric stent after ureteroscopy. Patients who were taking PDE5-Is, alpha-blockers or anticholinergics, had contraindication to sildenafil or developed postoperative complications were not included. Eligible patients were randomized using sealed closed envelops to one of two groups (S and C). Patients in group S received sildenafil citrate 50 mg tablet once daily. Patients in group C were the control. All patients answered the ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ) after 2 weeks of stenting. Primary outcome was the difference in total USSQ score between both groups. Secondary outcomes were tolerability of the treatment and the difference in each domain of USSQ score.
resultsAfter randomization, four patients (7.3%) in group C withdraw their consent because of severe symptoms and two patients (3.6%) in group S discontinued treatment because of headache and dizziness. Final analysis was performed for 46 and 48 patients in groups C and S, respectively. Total USSQ score and all domains (except work performance) were significantly lower in group S (P < 0.001). Dysuria and urgency were significantly more in group C (P = 0.012 and 0.007, respectively). Three patients in groups S (6.25%) experienced transient mild adverse effects (dyspepsia, flushing and rhinitis in one patient for each) but they continued sildenafil.
conclusionsSildenafil is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for relieving ureteral stent-related symptoms in men. CLINICALTRIAL. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02345980.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.