Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29766062›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2016

Through the looking glass: early non-invasive imaging in TBI predicts the need for interventions.

Jacob Glaser, Matthew Vasquez, Cassandra Cardarelli, Samuel Galvagno, Deborah Stein, Sarah Murthi, Thomas Scalea

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jacob GlaserDivision of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Matthew VasquezWalter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Cassandra CardarelliWalter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Samuel GalvagnoDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Deborah SteinDivision of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Sarah MurthiDivision of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Thomas ScaleaDivision of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USWalter Reed National Military Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly diagnosis and treatment of traumatic brain injury (TBI) lead to better outcomes. It is difficult to predict which patients benefit from specialised centres, leading to over triage or delay in definitive care. We propose that a non-invasive test comprising optic nerve sheath ultrasound, transcranial Doppler and quantitative papillary reactivity is feasible, correlates with CT findings and may allow for accurate early identification of TBI.

methodsA 1-year, prospective observation study evaluated a low-risk, non-invasive method of assessing brain injury. Patients underwent a non-invasive neurological examination for trauma, including the above assessments. Data from the three examinations were collected within 6 hours of injury and at 24 hours, and were analysed. Demographics, haemodynamic data, imaging results and short-term outcomes/interventions were recorded.

resultsTrauma patients over the age of 18 years, with a Glascow coma scale (GCS) of <12 or CT evidence of TBI, and intubated were included (N=100). These were divided into +CT (n=49) and -CT groups (n=51) according to the Marshall CT classification of TBI. The +CT group was older, with worse GCS and higher lactate (p=0.008, p=0.001 and p=0.01) but were otherwise well matched. The +CT group included all TBI types, with 96% of the patients having more than one type of TBI. Pulsatility index and neurologic pupillary index were predictive of a +CT (p=0.04, p=0.02). Area under the receiver-operating curve for the logistic regression model for the prediction of positive radiographic findings was r=0.718. Finally, we suggest a preliminary scoring heuristic for predicting a positive radiological finding in a patient with TBI.

conclusionsThe proposed examination is a feasible, non-invasive tool that may have clinical utility in the early prediction of TBI. If validated, it may improve trauma triage for the brain-injured patient. Further studies are warranted to validate this model.

Indexed as

Noninvasiveoptic nerveTranscranial Dopplertraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID29766062
PMCPMC5891716
OpenAlexW2528811256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.