ArticleThe journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM
International Elective Opportunities in United States Anesthesia Residency Programs.
Article in The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global health in Canadian anesthesiology residency programs: an online survey of opportunities and barriers.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- What Is the Current Status of Global Health Training for US Postgraduate Trainees in Anesthesiology? What Are Possible Visions for the Future?Current anesthesiology reports · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Global health is a recognized component of medical education and is increasingly included in residency programs. International electives have the potential to improve global health training by providing exposure to different populations and the challenges of health disparities. The objective of this study was to describe international elective opportunities in US anesthesiology residency training programs, including an assessment the types of programs offered and the obstacles to providing this type of training. Methods: An electronic survey was sent to 122 anesthesiology programs. The survey defined an international experience as "a time in which a current US anesthesiology resident traveled outside of the US to pursue a healthcare-related experience." Details describing international opportunities were collected. Responses were stratified by geographic region, program size, and by the availability of international electives. The websites of all surveyed programs were then reviewed to determine specific mention of international or global health programs. These results were compared to the survey responses. Results: In the website review, 33.6% of programs' websites described international electives for residents. Among all surveyed programs, 56 (45.9%) completed surveys were returned, with 39 (69.6%) of these programs offering international electives. Not all programs with electives described the offering on their websites. There was no relationship between program size or location and the availability of an elective. At most programs with international electives, at least 4 residents participated annually. Funding was the primary barrier to providing international electives. Perceptions of international electives were generally positive. Conclusions: A large proportion of US anesthesia residency programs offer international electives, and perceptions of global health in anesthesiology are positive. This is consistent with developments in global health in other subspecialty fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29766037PMC5944409What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.