ArticleReports of biochemistry & molecular biology2018
Effects of Oral Probiotic Feeding on Toll-Like Receptor Gene Expression of the Chicken's Cecal Tonsil.
Article in Reports of biochemistry & molecular biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Direct-fed Microbials (DFM) and Poultry Genomics: A Synergistic Approach to Sustainable Antibiotic Free Farming.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- In-vitro evaluation of probiotic potential of gut microbes isolated from retail chicken.PloS one · 2026Article
- Protective Effects of Probiotics Against Systemic Inflammation in Mice Model with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Induced by Cigarette-smoke.Reports of biochemistry & molecular biology · 2024Article
- Inflammatory Modulation Effects of Probiotics: A Safe and Promising Modulator for Cancer Prevention.Current microbiology · 2024Review
- Effects of bacteriophage on Salmonella Enteritidis infection in broilers.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Role of probiotics in managing various human diseases, from oral pathology to cancer and gastrointestinal diseases.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Effects of bacteriophage supplement on the growth performance, microbial population, and PGC-1α and TLR4 gene expressions of broiler chickens.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Assessment of Performance, Microbial Community, Bacterial Food Quality, and Gene Expression of Whiteleg Shrimp (Aquaculture nutrition · 2022Article
- Modulatory Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- The Potential of Toll-Like Receptors to Modulate Avian Immune System: Exploring the Effects of Genetic Variants and Phytonutrients.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt was proposed that probiotics may influence immune system through direct or indirect exposure. Direct exposure is mostly mediated by surface receptors. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are conserved molecular sensors which could be triggered via some pathogen associated structures, hence, modulate the immune responses. This study was conducted to elucidate the impact of lactobacillus acidophilus as a common probiotic on the expression level of TLRs in the chicken's cecal tonsil.
methodsThirty one-day-old chicken were selected and separated into three groups as probiotic-fed, dairy-fed and control. In addition to commercial powder supply, each chicken in the probiotic-fed group received 109 CFU/Kg of L. acidophilus daily. While, chickens in the dairy-fed group were provided with commercial powder feed and sterile dairy milk. After 14 and 21 days of oral feeding the cecal tonsil was removed and the expression of TLR2, TLR4 and TLR5 were examined by real-time PCR.
resultsAt the age of 14-day, there was a slight upregulation in the expression levels of TLR2 (118.9%), TLR4 (129.6%) and TLR5 (123.7%) of the cecal tonsil in the probiotic-fed group; however, these alterations were not statistically significant. At the age of 21-day, a non-significant downregulation was observed in TLR expression level of both dairy-fed (TLR2, 85%; TLR4, 79.5%; and TLR5, 86.5%) and probiotic-fed (TLR2, 88.8%; TLR4, 81%; and TLR5, 87.2%) groups in comparison to controls.
conclusionThe findings revealed that although the probiotic supplementation could be useful but it did not significantly affect innate immunity state through alteration of TLRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29765997PMC5941120W2767931548What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.