Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29765997›Full record

ArticleReports of biochemistry & molecular biology2018

Effects of Oral Probiotic Feeding on Toll-Like Receptor Gene Expression of the Chicken's Cecal Tonsil.

Fatemeh Asgari, Reza Falak, Shahram Teimourian, Babak Pourakbari, Salimeh Ebrahimnezhad, Mehdi Shekarabi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of biochemistry & molecular biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Modulatory Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fatemeh AsgariImmunology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Reza FalakImmunology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shahram TeimourianDepartment of Medical Genetics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Babak PourakbariPediatric Infectious Diseases Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Salimeh EbrahimnezhadDepartment of Immunology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mehdi ShekarabiImmunology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Iran University of Medical Sciences · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt was proposed that probiotics may influence immune system through direct or indirect exposure. Direct exposure is mostly mediated by surface receptors. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are conserved molecular sensors which could be triggered via some pathogen associated structures, hence, modulate the immune responses. This study was conducted to elucidate the impact of lactobacillus acidophilus as a common probiotic on the expression level of TLRs in the chicken's cecal tonsil.

methodsThirty one-day-old chicken were selected and separated into three groups as probiotic-fed, dairy-fed and control. In addition to commercial powder supply, each chicken in the probiotic-fed group received 109 CFU/Kg of L. acidophilus daily. While, chickens in the dairy-fed group were provided with commercial powder feed and sterile dairy milk. After 14 and 21 days of oral feeding the cecal tonsil was removed and the expression of TLR2, TLR4 and TLR5 were examined by real-time PCR.

resultsAt the age of 14-day, there was a slight upregulation in the expression levels of TLR2 (118.9%), TLR4 (129.6%) and TLR5 (123.7%) of the cecal tonsil in the probiotic-fed group; however, these alterations were not statistically significant. At the age of 21-day, a non-significant downregulation was observed in TLR expression level of both dairy-fed (TLR2, 85%; TLR4, 79.5%; and TLR5, 86.5%) and probiotic-fed (TLR2, 88.8%; TLR4, 81%; and TLR5, 87.2%) groups in comparison to controls.

conclusionThe findings revealed that although the probiotic supplementation could be useful but it did not significantly affect innate immunity state through alteration of TLRs.

Indexed as

Cecal tonsilChickenProbioticTLR

Identifiers

PMID29765997
PMCPMC5941120
OpenAlexW2767931548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.