ArticleAnnals of rehabilitation medicine2018
Comparison of Second and Third Editions of the Bayley Scales in Children With Suspected Developmental Delay.
Article in Annals of rehabilitation medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prevalence of motor development delay in children with craniosynostosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
- Early interventions with parental participation and their implications on the neurodevelopment of premature children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- A Meta-Analysis of Neurodevelopmental Outcomes following Intravitreal Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Retinopathy of Prematurity.Neonatology · 2023Pooled it
- Growth and risk of adverse neuro-developmental outcome in infants with congenital heart disease: A systematic review.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2023Pooled it
- Growth and risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcome in infants with congenital surgical anomalies: a systematic review.Pediatric surgery international · 2022Pooled it
- Prenatal Mercury Exposure and Neurodevelopment up to the Age of 5 Years: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Developmental delay in infants and toddlers with sickle cell disease: a systematic review.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Neurodevelopmental outcomes after ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement in children with non-infectious hydrocephalus: a meta-analysis.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2021Pooled it
- Outcomes after corrective surgery for congenital dextro-transposition of the arteries using the arterial switch technique: a scoping systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Balancing precision and affordability in assessing infant development in large-scale mortality trials: secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2025Trial
- Effects of caffeine therapy for apnea of prematurity on sleep and neurodevelopment of preterm infants at 6 months of corrected age.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2023Trial
- Neurodevelopmental Outcome in Very Preterm Infants Randomised to Receive Two Different Standardised, Concentrated Parenteral Nutrition Regimens.Nutrients · 2023Trial
- Associations of early life dietary diversity and child neurodevelopment: a prospective cohort study.Nutrition journal · 2026Article
- Case Report: Early multidisciplinary rehabilitation and longitudinal functional outcomes in a child with a maternally derived 15q11.2-q13.1 copy-number gain.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Radiographic Severity of Neonatal Deep Medullary Venous Thrombosis is Associated with Neurodevelopmental Impairment.The Journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Gestational age-specific sex difference in neurological outcomes of very low birth weight preterm infants-a nationwide study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Association of prenatal tobacco exposure and child neurodevelopment: Analysis of the ECHO cohort study.Tobacco induced diseases · 2025Article
- Neurodevelopmental outcome in preterm infants with intraventricular hemorrhages: the potential of quantitative brainstem MRI.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Long-term impact of late pulmonary hypertension requiring medication in extremely preterm infants with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evaluation of apparently healthy Egyptian infants and toddlers on the bayley-III scales according to age and sex.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the scores of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development second edition (BSID-II) and the third edition, Bayley-III, in children with suspected developmental delay and to determine the cutoff score for developmental delay in the Bayley-III.
methodsChildren younger than 42 months (n=62) with suspected developmental delay who visited our department between 2014 and 2015 were assessed with both the BSID-II and Bayley-III tests.
resultsThe mean Bayley-III Cognitive Language Composite (CLC) score was 5.8 points higher than the mean BSID-II Mental Developmental Index (MDI) score, and the mean Bayley-III Motor Composite (MC) score was 7.9 points higher than the mean BSID-II Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI) score. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of a BSID-II MDI score <70, Bayley-III CLC scores showed a cutoff of 78.0 (96.6% sensitivity and 93.9% specificity). In ROC analysis of a BSID-II PDI score <70, the Bayley-III MC score showed a cutoff of 80.
conclusionThere was a strong correlation between the BSID-II and Bayley-III in children with suspected developmental delay. The Bayley-III identified fewer children with developmental delay. The recommended cutoff value for developmental delay increased from a BSID-II score of 70 to a Bayley-III CLC score of 78 and Bayley-III MC score of 80.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.