Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29765848›Full record

ReviewBrain plasticity (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2016

MRI and M/EEG studies of the White Matter Development in Human Fetuses and Infants: Review and Opinion.

Jessica Dubois, Parvaneh Adibpour, Cyril Poupon, Lucie Hertz-Pannier, Ghislaine Dehaene-Lambertz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain plasticity (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. A Connectomic Hypothesis for the Hominization of the Brain.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2021
    Article
  11. Anatomo-functional correlates of auditory development in infancy.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jessica DuboisINSERM, UMR992; CEA, NeuroSpin Center; University Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Parvaneh AdibpourINSERM, UMR992; CEA, NeuroSpin Center; University Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Cyril PouponCEA, NeuroSpin Center, UNIRS; University Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Lucie Hertz-PannierCEA, NeuroSpin Center, UNIACT; University Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France; INSERM, UMR1129; University Paris Descartes, Paris, France.
Ghislaine Dehaene-LambertzINSERM, UMR992; CEA, NeuroSpin Center; University Paris Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Already during the last trimester of gestation, functional responses are recorded in foetuses and preterm newborns, attesting an already complex cerebral architecture. Then throughout childhood, anatomical connections are further refined but at different rates and over asynchronous periods across functional networks. Concurrently, infants gradually achieve new psychomotor and cognitive skills. Only the recent use of non-invasive techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magneto- and electroencephalography (M/EEG) has opened the possibility to understand the relationships between brain maturation and skills development

Indexed as

architectureBrain organizationbundlesdiffusion tensor imaging DTIevoked potentials or fieldsmaturationmyelinationrelaxometrysensory modalities

Identifiers

PMID29765848
PMCPMC5928537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.