ArticleJournal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base2018
Early-Career Surgical Practice for Cerebellopontine Angle Tumors in the Era of Radiosurgery.
Article in Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative analysis of clinical outcomes cerebellopontine angle meningioma versus cerebellopontine angle schwannoma: A retrospective insight from Pakistan.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Cerebellopontine angle meningioma in a patient presented as acute cerebrovascular accident.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- Deadly complication of sacrificing superior petrosal vein during cerebellopontine angle tumor resection: A case report and literature review.Surgical neurology international · 2021Article
- Small Cerebellopontine Angle Meningioma-Surgical Experience of 162 Patients and Literature Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- A modified park bench position: the "Dormeuse" position.Acta neurochirurgica · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We analyzed the outcomes of patients with large cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors treated by a skull-base team in which two surgeons (one neurosurgeon and one otological surgeon) were in the beginning of their careers (<40 years old). Data of patients operated on between April 2012 and March 2016 were reviewed. All factors related to surgical training were considered. Thirty-one patients had vestibular schwannomas, while 26 had meningiomas. Mean tumor diameter was 30.6 mm (range, 23-49 mm) for schwannomas and 35 mm (range, 22-51 mm) for meningiomas. Satisfactory postoperative facial nerve function (House-Brackmann's grade I or II) was achieved in 20 (64.5%) schwannoma patients and 21 (80.7%) meningioma patients. Gross total and near-total resections (residual tumor < 5 mm) were achieved in 21 (67.7%) and 9 (29%) schwannoma patients, respectively. Gross total resection (Simpson's grade II) was achieved in 18 (69.2%) meningioma patients. In both groups, the retrosigmoid approach was the most common approach. Regarding surgical training of the two younger surgeons, during the residency period, they attended high-volume centers for CPA tumors. Application of microsurgical techniques was systematically applied from the beginning of their personal series in every intracranial pathology case. During the first 2 years of the series, they were supervised by more experienced surgeons and followed a stepwise sharing of increasingly difficult surgical phases; by comparing results of this period with the last 2 years of the series, where they acquired a complete autonomy, no relevant difference was detected. Our results suggest that young surgeons may achieve good results even at the beginning of their careers, if specific conditions related to training and mentorship are met.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.