Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29765703›Full record

ArticleRMD open2018

Effects of baricitinib on radiographic progression of structural joint damage at 1 year in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

Desirée van der Heijde, Maxime Dougados, Ying-Chou Chen, Maria Greenwald, Edit Drescher, Rena Klar, Li Xie, Inmaculada de la Torre, Terence P Rooney, Sarah L Witt and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RMD open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Desirée van der HeijdeLeiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5781-158X
Maxime DougadosDepartment of Rheumatology, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM (U1153), Paris, France.
Ying-Chou ChenChang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Maria GreenwaldDesert Medical Advances, Palm Desert, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2622-1448
Edit DrescherVeszprém Csolnoky Ferenc County Hospital, Vészprem, Hungary.
Rena KlarIQVIA, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Li XieEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Inmaculada de la TorreEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Terence P RooneyEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Sarah L WittEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Douglas E SchlichtingEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Stephanie de BonoEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Paul EmeryLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBaricitinib was efficacious in a 24-week phase III study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (csDMARDs) (RA-BUILD).

objectivesTo evaluate radiographic progression of structural joint damage in RA-BUILD patients over 48 weeks of baricitinib treatment in the long-term extension study, RA-BEYOND.

methodsIn RA-BUILD, patients were randomised to placebo, baricitinib 2 mg or 4 mg once daily, with rescue possible from week 16. Patients completing RA-BUILD and entering RA-BEYOND continued to receive the baricitinib dose received at the end of RA-BUILD. Patients receiving placebo were switched to baricitinib 4 mg in RA-BEYOND. Joint damage was measured using the van der Heijde modified total Sharp score. To account for missing scores and scores obtained after rescue, switch or discontinuation of study drug, data were analysed using (1) linear extrapolation (LE) and (2) observed/last observation carried forward (LOCF). The observed/LOCF method used all available observed data, including after rescue or switch, with patients analysed according to original treatment assignment.

resultsUsing LE, radiographic progression at 24 and 48 weeks was statistically significantly lower for both baricitinib 2 or 4 mg compared with placebo. Only baricitinib 4 mg demonstrated statistically significant inhibition of progressive radiographic joint damage compared with patients initially randomised to placebo using observed/LOCF at week 48.

conclusionsOnce daily oral baricitinib inhibited radiographic progression of structural joint damage in patients with an inadequate response or intolerance to csDMARDs over 48 weeks. The most robust benefit was seen for the 4 mg dose.

Indexed as

baricitinibcsDMARDRA-BUILDradiographic progressionrheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID29765703
PMCPMC5950651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.