ArticleIUCrJ2018
Survey and analysis of crystal polymorphism in organic structures.
Article in IUCrJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Isomorphism in a Series of Five Homologous Compounds.Crystal growth & design · 2026Article
- Assessing Polymorph Stability and Phase Transitions at Finite Temperature: Integrating Crystal Structure Prediction, Lattice Dynamics, and Molecular Dynamics.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Polymorphic ROYalty: The 14th ROY Polymorph Discovered via High-Throughput Crystallization.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
- Toward On-Demand Polymorphic Transitions of Organic Crystals via Side Chain and Lattice Dynamics Engineering.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2024Article
- Organic crystal structure prediction via coupled generative adversarial networks and graph convolutional networks.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2024Article
- One mol-ecule, three crystal structures: conformational trimorphism ofActa crystallographica. Section E, Crystallographic communications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the intention of producing the most comprehensive treatment of the prevalence of crystal polymorphism among structurally characterized materials, all polymorphic compounds flagged as such within the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) are analysed and a list of crystallographically characterized organic polymorphic compounds is assembled. Classifying these structures into subclasses of anhydrates, salts, hydrates, non-hydrated solvates and cocrystals reveals that there are significant variations in polymorphism prevalence as a function of crystal type, a fact which has not previously been recognized in the literature. It is also shown that, as a percentage, polymorphic entries are decreasing temporally within the CSD, with the notable exception of cocrystals, which continue to rise at a rate that is a constant fraction of the overall entries. Some phenomena identified that require additional scrutiny include the relative prevalence of temperature-induced phase transitions among organic salts and the paucity of polymorphism in crystals with three or more chemical components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.