Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29765597›Full record

ReviewEvolution, medicine, and public health2018

Cancer cell transmission via the placenta.

Mel Greaves, William Hughes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evolution, medicine, and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Cancer in pregnancy - The obstetrical management.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cancer as a Disease of the Cell.The oncologist · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. An Unusual Case of Malignant Melanoma with Metastasis to the Placenta During Pregnancy.European journal of case reports in internal medicine · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mel GreavesCentre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, Brookes Lawley Building, London SM2 5NG, UK.
William HughesSchool of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer cells have a parasitic propensity in the primary host but their capacity to transit between individuals is severely restrained by two factors: a lack of a route for viable cell transfer and immune recognition in allogeneic, secondary recipients. Several examples of transmissible animal cancers are now recognised. In humans, the only natural route for transmission is via the haemochorial placenta which is permissive for cell traffic. There are three special examples of this occurring

Indexed as

cancer clonal markerschoriocarcinomahaemochorial placentaimmune evasionplacental anastomoses

Identifiers

PMID29765597
PMCPMC5946918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.