ArticleElectronic physician2018
The antimicrobial activity of probiotic bacteria
Article in Electronic physician, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synbiotics: An Emerging Frontier in Infectious Diseases Control.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Agent-based model of the human colon to investigate mechanisms of pathogen colonization resistance.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- Microbial Contamination of Food: Probiotics and Postbiotics as Potential Biopreservatives.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of Nano-probiotics Versus Free Probiotics Against Gastrointestinal Pathogenic Bacteria.Indian journal of microbiology · 2024Article
- An Emerging Foodborne Pathogen Spotlight: A Bibliometric Analysis and Scholarly Review ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Probiotic Characterization of Arsenic-resistant Lactic Acid Bacteria for Possible Application as Arsenic Bioremediation Tool in Fish for Safe Fish Food Production.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2023Article
- Unveiling the Antibiotic Susceptibility and Antimicrobial Potential of Bacteria from Human Breast Milk of Pakistani Women: An Exploratory Study.BioMed research international · 2023Article
- Probiotic Formulations: A Patent Landscaping Using the Text Mining Approach.Current microbiology · 2022Review
- Native chicken-derivedIranian journal of microbiology · 2022Article
- Probiotic Properties of Lactobacillus Species Isolated from Fermented Palm Sap in Thailand.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2021Article
- Physico-chemical and cytotoxic analysis of a novel large molecular weight bacteriocin produced byIranian journal of microbiology · 2019Article
- Antimicrobial Effect and Probiotic Potential of Phage ResistantFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiarrheal diseases have been seen in all geographical areas throughout the world. Therefore, considering treatment, could be deemed a necessary action.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the antimicrobial effect of probiotic bacterial strains isolated from different natural sources against 2 pathotypes of pathogenic
methodsThis cross-sectional study of Martyr Chamran University of Ahvaz was carried out from December 2013 to July 2014. A total of 13 probiotic colonies isolated from 20 samples of traditional dairy products including (yogurt, cheese, milk) and 20 samples of vegetables including carrots and cabbages (red and white) of which 5 isolates were selected to evaluate the antimicrobial effect against 2
resultsObtained results showed growth inhibition effects of all 5 probiotic strains against
conclusionThis study demonstrated considerable antimicrobial effect against
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.