ArticleElectronic physician2018
Effects of multimodal communication program on patients with chronic aphasia: a single-subject A-B-A design study.
Article in Electronic physician, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Communication strategies for adults in palliative care: the speech-language therapists' perspective.BMC palliative care · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimAphasia as a common consequence of stroke, is an acquired neurologic communication disorder that can affect symbol language processing. Different types of intervention approaches have been introduced. Multimodal Communication Program (MCP) is a new augmentative alternative communication approach in chronic aphasia. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of MCP on communication skills of patients with chronic aphasia.
methodsThis prospective, single subject, A-B-A design study was done during 2016 in Semnan, Iran. Participants were two patients with severe aphasia with a single left-hemisphere stroke. Three phases, including baseline, intervention and follow-up were administered. The patients received nine-hour intervention, over 10 working days.
resultsThree different scores were calculated for each patient: verbal efforts, the frequency of each modality and the accuracy of switching between modalities and the reaction time. The frequency of verbal modality increased for both patients. They could switch between modalities more successfully than before the intervention. The results for the reaction time, however were challenging. The onset reaction time decreased for patient 1, and increased during switching between modalities, and patient 2 showed the opposite.
conclusionThe MCP can improve the communication skills in patients with chronic post stroke aphasia. However, some factors, such as reduction of the patients' reaction time is probably related to the amount of allocated resources during intervention.
trial registrationThe trial was registered at IRCT center with ID: IRCT2016032325194N3.
fundingThe study was financed by Semnan University of Medical Sciences (Grant no.: A-10-333-3).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.