Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29765437›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2018

Evaluation of ovarian reserve in women with overt or subclinical hypothyroidism.

Ferit Kerim Kucukler, Umit Gorkem, Yasin Simsek, Ramazan Kocabas, Serdar Guler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Ovarian reserve in adolescent girls with autoimmune thyroiditis.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ferit Kerim KucuklerDepartment of Endocrinology, Faculty of Medicine, Hitit University, Corum, Turkey.
Umit GorkemDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Hitit University, Corum, Turkey.
Yasin SimsekDepartment of Endocrinology, Kayseri Training and Research Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey.
Ramazan KocabasDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Hitit University, Corum, Turkey.
Serdar GulerDepartment of Endocrinology, Faculty of Medicine, Hitit University, Corum, Turkey.
Hitit Üniversitesi · TRKayseri Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThyroid dysfunction is among the most common autoimmune disorders in women of reproductive age. Previous studies have shown the association between autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) and infertility. Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is secreted by granulosa cells and is a useful marker for assessment of ovarian reserve. In the present study, we sought to evaluate the ovarian reserves of women with autoimmune thyroid disorder by measurement of AMH values. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis prospective study included women with newly diagnosed AITD aged between 20 and 40 years. Patients were divided into three groups: subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH,

resultsNo significant difference was found among SCH, OH and CG in regard to ovarian reserves measured by AMH values (

conclusionsAlthough AMH values were not significantly different among groups, AMH values were lower in OH and SCH patients, indicating a possible need for close monitoring of these patients.

Indexed as

anti-Müllerian hormoneautoimmune thyroid diseasefertile women

Identifiers

PMID29765437
PMCPMC5949893
OpenAlexW2407993576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.