Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29765421›Full record

ArticleStem cells international2018

Retention and Functional Effect of Adipose-Derived Stromal Cells Administered in Alginate Hydrogel in a Rat Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Bjarke Follin, Adam Ali Ghotbi, Andreas Ettrup Clemmensen, Simon Bentsen, Morten Juhl, Rebekka Harary Søndergaard, Lisbeth Drozd Lund, Mandana Haack-Sørensen, Philip Hasbak, Smadar Cohen and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Bjarke FollinCardiology Stem Cell Centre, the Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5536-4168
Adam Ali GhotbiDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Imaging & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andreas Ettrup ClemmensenDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Imaging & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Simon BentsenDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Imaging & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Morten JuhlCardiology Stem Cell Centre, the Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rebekka Harary SøndergaardCardiology Stem Cell Centre, the Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lisbeth Drozd LundCardiology Stem Cell Centre, the Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mandana Haack-SørensenCardiology Stem Cell Centre, the Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Philip HasbakDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Imaging & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Smadar CohenRegenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research Center and Avram and Stella Goldstein-Goren Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Rasmus Sejersten RipaDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Imaging & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jens KastrupCardiology Stem Cell Centre, the Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3668-5393
Annette EkblondCardiology Stem Cell Centre, the Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andreas KjærDepartment of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Imaging & PET and Cluster for Molecular Imaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2706-5547
University of Copenhagen · DKBen-Gurion University of the Negev · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCell therapy for heart disease has been proven safe and efficacious, despite poor cell retention in the injected area. Improving cell retention is hypothesized to increase the treatment effect. In the present study, human adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs) were delivered in an in situ forming alginate hydrogel following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in rats.

methodsASCs were transduced with luciferase and tested for ASC phenotype. AMI was inducted in nude rats, with subsequent injection of saline (controls), 1 × 10

resultsASCs in both saline and alginate hydrogel significantly increased the ejection fraction (7.2% and 7.8% at 14 days and 7.2% and 8.0% at 28 days, resp.). After 28 days, there was a tendency for decreased infarct area and increased perfusion, compared to controls. No significant differences were observed between ASCs in saline or alginate hydrogel, in terms of retention and functional salvage.

conclusionASCs improved the myocardial function after AMI, but administration in the alginate hydrogel did not further improve retention of the cells or myocardial function.

Identifiers

PMID29765421
PMCPMC5892231
OpenAlexW2790370964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.