Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29765418›Full record

ArticleStem cells international2018

Isolation and Characterisation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Rat Bone Marrow and the Endosteal Niche: A Comparative Study.

Norhayati Yusop, Paul Battersby, Amr Alraies, Alastair J Sloan, Ryan Moseley, Rachel J Waddington

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Differential circRNA and mRNA Expression Profiling During Osteogenic Differentiation in Rat Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Norhayati YusopOral and Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry and Cardiff Institute Tissue Engineering and Repair, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Paul BattersbyOral and Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry and Cardiff Institute Tissue Engineering and Repair, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Amr AlraiesOral and Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry and Cardiff Institute Tissue Engineering and Repair, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Alastair J SloanOral and Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry and Cardiff Institute Tissue Engineering and Repair, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1791-0903
Ryan MoseleyOral and Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry and Cardiff Institute Tissue Engineering and Repair, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Rachel J WaddingtonOral and Biomedical Sciences, School of Dentistry and Cardiff Institute Tissue Engineering and Repair, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5878-1434
Cardiff University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within bone, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) exist within the bone marrow stroma (BM-MSC) and the endosteal niche, as cells lining compact bone (CB-MSCs). This study isolated and characterised heterogeneous MSC populations from each niche and subsequently investigated the effects of extensive cell expansion, analysing population doublings (PDs)/cellular senescence, colony-forming efficiencies (CFEs), MSC cell marker expression, and osteogenic/adipogenic differentiation. CB-MSCs and BM-MSCs demonstrated similar morphologies and PDs, reaching 100 PDs. Both populations exhibited consistent telomere lengths (12-17 kb), minimal senescence, and positive telomerase expression. CB-MSCs (PD15) had significantly lower CFEs than PD50. CB-MSCs and BM-MSCs both expressed MSC (CD73/CD90/CD105); embryonic (Nanog) and osteogenic markers (Runx2, osteocalcin) but no hematopoietic markers (CD45). CB-MSCs (PD15) strongly expressed Oct4 and p16

Identifiers

PMID29765418
PMCPMC5885338
OpenAlexW2775249153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.