Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29765379›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2018

Antoine Bigard, Dargie T Berhe, Eleonora Maoddi, Yannick Sire, Jean-Michel Boursiquot, Hernan Ojeda, Jean-Pierre Péros, Agnès Doligez, Charles Romieu, Laurent Torregrosa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Inhibition of the sea Gene Expression inArchives of Razi Institute · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Adjustment of KInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Frontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Antoine BigardAGAP, University of Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
Dargie T BerheUE INRA de Pech-Rouge, University of Montpellier, INRA, Montpellier, France.
Eleonora MaoddiAGAP, University of Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
Yannick SireUE INRA de Pech-Rouge, University of Montpellier, INRA, Montpellier, France.
Jean-Michel BoursiquotAGAP, University of Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
Hernan OjedaUE INRA de Pech-Rouge, University of Montpellier, INRA, Montpellier, France.
Jean-Pierre PérosAGAP, University of Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
Agnès DoligezAGAP, University of Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
Charles RomieuAGAP, University of Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
Laurent TorregrosaAGAP, University of Montpellier, CIRAD, INRA, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The wine industry is facing critical issues due to climate changes since production is established on very tight Genotype × Environment interaction bases. While, some cultivation practices may reduce adverse effects of abiotic stresses on the vines, e.g., the use of irrigation to mitigate drought, the deleterious impacts of warming on fruit development are difficult to manage. Elevated temperature alters grapevine fruit growth and composition, with a critical increase of the sugars/organic acids ratio. Select grapes with improved metabolite balances to offset high temperature effects is a valuable option to sustain viticulture. Unfortunately, the lack of knowledge about the genetic diversity for fruit traits impacted by temperature impairs the design of breeding programs. This study aimed to assess the variation in berry volume, main sugars and organic acids amounts in genetic resources. Fruit phenotyping focused on two critical stages of development: the end of green lag phase when organic acidity reaches its maximum, and the ripe stage when sugar unloading and water uptake stop. For that purpose, we studied a panel of 33 genotypes, including 12 grapevine varieties and 21 microvine offspring. To determine the date of sampling for each critical stage, fruit texture and growth were carefully monitored. Analyses at both stages revealed large phenotypic variation for malic and tartaric acids, as well as for sugars and berry size. At ripe stage, fruit fresh weight ranged from 1.04 to 5.25 g and sugar concentration from 751 to 1353 mmol.L

Indexed as

climate warmingfruit growthgeneticsgrapevineorganic acidssugarsVitis vinifera

Identifiers

PMID29765379
PMCPMC5938353
OpenAlexW2797949503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.