Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29765370›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2018

Pig Farmers' Homes Harbor More Diverse Airborne Bacterial Communities Than Pig Stables or Suburban Homes.

Ditte V Vestergaard, Gitte J Holst, Ioannis Basinas, Grethe Elholm, Vivi Schlünssen, Allan Linneberg, Tina Šantl-Temkiv, Kai Finster, Torben Sigsgaard, Ian P G Marshall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The Indoor Microbiome: Sampling, Analysis and Emerging Trends.Environmental microbiology reports · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Applying the exposome concept to working life health: The EU EPHOR project.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The internationalization of human microbiome research.Current opinion in microbiology · 2019
    Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ditte V VestergaardSection for Environment, Occupation and Health, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Gitte J HolstSection for Environment, Occupation and Health, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ioannis BasinasCentre for Human Exposure Science, Institute of Occupational Medicine, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Grethe ElholmSection for Environment, Occupation and Health, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Vivi SchlünssenSection for Environment, Occupation and Health, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Allan LinnebergDepartment of Clinical Experimental Research, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.
Tina Šantl-TemkivSection for Microbiology, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kai FinsterSection for Microbiology, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Torben SigsgaardSection for Environment, Occupation and Health, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ian P G MarshallSection for Microbiology, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Airborne bacterial communities are subject to conditions ill-suited to microbial activity and growth. In spite of this, air is an important transfer medium for bacteria, with the bacteria in indoor air having potentially major consequences for the health of a building's occupants. A major example is the decreased diversity and altered composition of indoor airborne microbial communities as a proposed explanation for the increasing prevalence of asthma and allergies worldwide. Previous research has shown that living on a farm confers protection against development of asthma and allergies, with airborne bacteria suggested as playing a role in this protective effect. However, the composition of this beneficial microbial community has still not been identified. We sampled settled airborne dust using a passive dust sampler from Danish pig stables, associated farmers' homes, and from suburban homes (267 samples in total) and carried out quantitative PCR measurements of bacterial abundance and MiSeq sequencing of the V3-V4 region of bacterial 16S rRNA genes found in these samples. Airborne bacteria had a greater diversity and were significantly more abundant in pig stables and farmers' homes than suburban homes (Wilcoxon rank sum test

Indexed as

16S rRNA geneairborne bacteriabacteriabuilt environmentmicrobiomepig stables

Identifiers

PMID29765370
PMCPMC5938556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.