Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29765260›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2018

Attitude and perception of undergraduate medical students toward the problem-based learning in Chitwan Medical College, Nepal.

Ram Lochan Yadav, Rano Mal Piryani, Gopendra Prasad Deo, Dev Kumar Shah, Laxmi Kumari Yadav, Md Nazrul Islam

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Some reflections on problem-based learning medical curriculum.Advances in medical education and practice · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ram Lochan YadavDepartment of Physiology, Chitwan Medical College, Bharatpur, Nepal.
Rano Mal PiryaniDepartment of Internal Medicine and Health Professional Educational Research Center (HPERC), Chitwan Medical College, Bharatpur, Nepal.
Gopendra Prasad DeoDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Chitwan Medical College, Bharatpur, Nepal.
Dev Kumar ShahDepartment of Physiology, Chitwan Medical College, Bharatpur, Nepal.
Laxmi Kumari YadavDepartment of Microbiology, Chitwan Medical College, Bharatpur, Nepal.
Md Nazrul IslamDepartment of Physiology, Chitwan Medical College, Bharatpur, Nepal.
Chitwan Medical College · NP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProblem-based learning (PBL) was introduced into Basic Medical Sciences early in the 1980s at Tribhuvan University (TU), Nepal, followed by other universities where didactic lecture method was still followed as the main teaching strategy. Despite gaining its popularity worldwide as integrated teaching learning method, PBL is not given importance in Nepal. This study aimed to assess the attitude and perceptions of undergraduate medical students regarding learning outcomes of PBL and to know their views about role and qualities of effective tutors for its successful implementation.

methodsThis descriptive study was based on a self-administered questionnaire. The first part of the questionnaire measured students' perception and attitude toward benefits of PBL and the second part measured students' perception about role of PBL tutor. Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) first year (2014/2015 academic year) students at Chitwan Medical College, TU, were asked to express their opinions about the importance of learning outcomes by rating each statement on a five-point Likert scale and the responses were combined into three categorical variables: "agree" (strongly agree plus agree), "neutral", and "disagree" (strongly disagree plus disagree). Data were analyzed using SPSS version 21.0.

resultsApproximately 85.5% participants agreed that PBL is an interesting method of teaching learning. Most of them (86.7%) accepted that PBL is an interactive and a mutual learning method and improves self-directed learning (83.2%). Although 78% had recommended it better than lecture, many (54.2%) pointed it out as a time-consuming method. The participants were also highly rated (80.5%) to the statement - the tutor's role in enhancing the constructive active learning and maintaining good intra-personal behavior.

conclusionStudent's attitude toward PBL was positive. They highly appreciated the roles of a tutor as facilitators and motivators for proper activities in PBL session. PBL sessions were considered effective in improving students professional knowledge and refining problem-solving and self-directed learning skills along with enriching teamwork experience.

Indexed as

PBLrole of tutorstudent’s perceptionteaching learning method

Identifiers

PMID29765260
PMCPMC5942169
OpenAlexW2800151116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.