Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29765198›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2018

Management of post-LASIK dry eye: a multicenter randomized comparison of a new multi-ingredient artificial tear to carboxymethylcellulose.

Avi Wallerstein, W Bruce Jackson, Jeffrey Chambers, Amir M Moezzi, Hugh Lin, Peter A Simmons

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01886690 (A Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of a New Eye Drop Formulation With REFRESH PLUS® in Participants Following LASIK Refractive Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01886690 phase3completednot on this map

A Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of a New Eye Drop Formulation With REFRESH PLUS® in Participants Following LASIK Refractive Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorAllerganRan2013 to 2014Enrolled148ConditionsBilateral LASIK SurgeryArmscarboxymethylcellulose sodium based new eye drop formulation, carboxymethylcellulose sodium based eye drops
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Refractive surgery and dry eye - An update.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Refractive surgery beyond 2020.Eye (London, England) · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Avi WallersteinDepartment of Ophthalmology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
W Bruce JacksonUniversity of Ottawa Eye Institute of the Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Jeffrey ChambersKelowna Eye Care Center, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
Amir M MoezziCentre for Ocular Research & Education (CORE, formerly Centre for Contact Lens Research), School of Optometry & Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Hugh LinAllergan Clinical Research, Allergan plc, Irvine, CA, USA.
Peter A SimmonsAllergan Clinical Research, Allergan plc, Irvine, CA, USA.
Allergan (Ireland) · IEKelowna General Hospital · CAMcGill University · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Waterloo · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the efficacy and safety of a preservative-free, multi-ingredient formulation of carboxymethylcellulose 0.5%, hyaluronic acid 0.1%, and organic osmolytes (CMC-HA), to preservative-free carboxymethylcellulose 0.5% (CMC) in the management of postoperative signs and symptoms of dry eye following laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

methodsThis was a double-masked, randomized, parallel-group study conducted in 14 clinical centers in Canada and Australia. Subjects with no more than mild dry eye instilled CMC-HA or CMC for 90 days post-LASIK. Ocular Surface Disease Index

resultsA total of 148 subjects (CMC-HA, n=75; CMC, n=73) were enrolled and assigned to receive treatment, and 126 subjects completed the study without any protocol violations. Post-LASIK, dry eye signs/symptoms peaked at 10 days. OSDI scores for both groups returned to normal with no differences between treatment groups at day 90 (

conclusionCMC-HA-containing artificial tears relieved post-LASIK ocular dryness as well as CMC alone, and demonstrated incremental benefit in uncorrected vision, with a favorable safety profile. Results support use of CMC-HA eye drops to reduce signs and symptoms of ocular dryness post-LASIK.

Indexed as

artificial tearscarboxymethylcellulosedry eyehyaluronic acidLASIKocular surface disease

Identifiers

PMID29765198
PMCPMC5944453
OpenAlexW2801072952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.