Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29765151›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of cancer2018

Apatorsen plus docetaxel versus docetaxel alone in platinum-resistant metastatic urothelial carcinoma (Borealis-2).

Jonathan E Rosenberg, Noah M Hahn, Meredith M Regan, Lillian Werner, Ajjai Alva, Saby George, Joel Picus, Robert Alter, Arjun Balar, Jean Hoffman-Censits and 14 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Development and Clinical Applications of Antisense Oligonucleotide Gapmers.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Heat Shock Proteins and HSF1 in Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 19 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan E RosenbergMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Noah M HahnSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Meredith M ReganDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Lillian WernerDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Ajjai AlvaUniversity of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Saby GeorgeRoswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Joel PicusSiteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Robert AlterJohn Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Arjun BalarNew York University Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Jean Hoffman-CensitsSidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Petros GrivasCleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Richard LauerUniversity of New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Elizabeth A GuancialUniversity of Rochester Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY, USA.
Christopher HoimesUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Guru SonpavdeUniversity of Alabama Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Constantine AlbanyIndiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Mark N SteinRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Tim BreenHoosier Cancer Research Network, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Cindy JacobsOncoGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bothell, WA, USA.
Kirsten AndersonOncoGenex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bothell, WA, USA.
Joaquim BellmuntDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Aly-Khan A LalaniDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Sumanta PalCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Toni K ChoueiriDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. Toni_Choueiri@DFCI.HARVARD.EDU.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9201-3217
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USOncoGenex Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USCity of Hope · USCleveland Clinic · USHackensack University Medical Center · USHoosier Cancer Research Network (United States) · USIndiana University Health · USJohns Hopkins University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNYU Langone’s Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer CenterRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USSidney Kimmel Cancer Center · USUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of Rochester · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA randomised study to assess the addition of apatorsen, an antisense oligonucleotide that inhibits Hsp27 expression, to docetaxel in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) relapsed after prior platinum-based chemotherapy.

methodsMulticentre, phase II study with 1:1 randomisation to apatorsen (three loading doses at 600 mg intravenous followed by weekly doses) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m

resultsPatients randomised to A/D (n = 99) had improved OS compared to docetaxel alone (n = 101): HR: 0.80, 80% CI: 0.65-0.98, P = 0.0784, median 6.4 vs 5.9 months. PFS and ORR were similar in both arms. A/D had more incidence of sepsis and urinary tract infections. Patients with baseline Hsp27 levels <5.7 ng/mL had improved OS compared to those with levels ≥5.7 ng/mL. Patients with a decline or ≤20.5% increase in Hsp27 from baseline benefited more from A/D than those with >20.5% increase.

conclusionsA/D met its predefined OS end point in patients with platinum-refractory mUC in this phase II trial. This trial is hypothesis generating requiring further study before informing practice.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Transitional CellDocetaxelDown-RegulationDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHeat-Shock ProteinsHSP27 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansMaleMiddle AgedapatorsenDocetaxelHeat-Shock ProteinsHSP27 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSPB1 protein, humanMolecular ChaperonesOligonucleotides

Identifiers

PMID29765151
PMCPMC5988804
OpenAlexW2804391526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.