Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29765147›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2018

Systemic treatments for high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Géraldine Pignot, Denis Maillet, Emmanuel Gross, Philippe Barthelemy, Jean-Baptiste Beauval, Friederike Constans-Schlurmann, Yohann Loriot, Guillaume Ploussard, Paul Sargos, Marc-Olivier Timsit and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparing the diagnostic value ofTranslational andrology and urology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Géraldine PignotService de Chirurgie Oncologique 2, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France. pignotg@ipc.unicancer.fr.
Denis MailletMedical Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Institut de Cancérologie des Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), Centre d'Investigation de Thérapeutiques en Oncologie et Hématologie de Lyon (CITOHL), Pierre-Bénite, France.
Emmanuel GrossRamsay Générale de Santé, Hôpital Privé Clairval, Marseille, France.
Philippe BarthelemyMedical Oncology Department, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Jean-Baptiste BeauvalDepartment of Urology, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France.
Friederike Constans-SchlurmannMedical Oncology Department, CHIC Quimper, Quimper, France.
Yohann LoriotDépartement de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France.
Guillaume PloussardDepartment of Urology, Clinique St Jean du Languedoc, Toulouse, France.
Paul SargosDepartment of Radiation Therapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
Marc-Olivier TimsitDepartment of Urology, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou (HEGP), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France.
Sébastien VincendeauDepartment of Urology, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Gilles PasticierDepartment of Urology, CHU Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France.
Delphine BorchielliniDepartment of Oncology, Antoine-Lacassagne Center, Nice, France.
Centre Antoine Lacassagne · FRCentre Hospitalier de Cornouaille · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRHôpital Pellegrin · FRHôpital privé Clairval · FRHôpital Rangueil · FRHôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRInstitut Bergonié · FRInstitut Paoli-Calmettes · FRInstitut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole · FRUniversité Paris-Saclay · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of patients with prostate cancer who later develop lethal metastatic disease have high-risk localized disease at presentation, emphasizing the importance of effective treatment strategies at this stage. Multimodal treatment approaches that combine systemic and local therapies offer a promising strategy for improving the clinical outcomes of patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer. Combinations of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or chemohormonal therapy are considered to be the standard of care in most solid tumours and should be investigated in the future for the treatment of prostate cancer to improve patient outcomes. However, although the combination of androgen deprivation therapy and radiotherapy is a standard of care in high-risk localized or locally advanced prostate cancer, the benefit of chemotherapy or chemohormonal therapy has yet to be demonstrated outside of the metastatic setting. Moreover, the benefit of neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant systemic therapies in combination with radical prostatectomy has not been proved. The development of next-generation hormonal agents, which have been approved for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer, offers further therapeutic possibilities that are being assessed in early-phase clinical trials.

Indexed as

Neoplasm StagingCombined Modality TherapyHumansMaleNeoadjuvant TherapyProstateProstatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID29765147
OpenAlexW2804202174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.