ArticleScientific reports2018
Distinguishing mirtrons from canonical miRNAs with data exploration and machine learning methods.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- mirtronDB 2.0: enhanced database with novel mirtron discoveries.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Multi-tissue miRNA networks in preterm birth: from molecular mechanisms to precision medicine.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- A time course analysis through diapause reveals dynamic temporal patterns of microRNAs associated with endocrine regulation in the butterfly Pieris napi.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Mitochondrial microRNAs (mitomiRs) as emerging biomarkers and therapeutic targets for chronic human diseases.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- More than the SRY: The Non-Coding Landscape of the Y Chromosome and Its Importance in Human Disease.Non-coding RNA · 2024Review
- Implications of SNP-triggered miRNA dysregulation in Schizophrenia development.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Review
- SARS-CoV-2-associated organs failure and inflammation: a focus on the role of cellular and viral microRNAs.Virology journal · 2023Review
- A Glance at Biogenesis and Functionality of MicroRNAs and Their Role in the Neuropathogenesis of Parkinson's Disease.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2023Review
- A Non-Canonical Link between Non-Coding RNAs and Cardiovascular Diseases.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- MicroRNA Databases and Tools.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Splice and Dice: Intronic microRNAs, Splicing and Cancer.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- MicroRNAs and Stem-like Properties: The Complex Regulation Underlying Stemness Maintenance and Cancer Development.Biomolecules · 2021Review
- A hybrid CNN-LSTM model for pre-miRNA classification.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Myocardial Infarction: The Protective Role of MiRNAs in Myocardium Pathology.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Approaches Toward Targeting Matrix Metalloproteases for Prognosis and Therapies in Gynecological Cancer: MicroRNAs as a Molecular Driver.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Review
- The Impact of Adipose Tissue-Derived miRNAs in Metabolic Syndrome, Obesity, and Cancer.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2020Review
- microRNAs Biogenesis, Functions and Role in Tumor Angiogenesis.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Analysis of conserved miRNAs in cynomolgus macaque genome using small RNA sequencing and homology searching.PeerJ · 2020Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mirtrons are non-canonical microRNAs encoded in introns the biogenesis of which starts with splicing. They are not processed by Drosha and enter the canonical pathway at the Exportin-5 level. Mirtrons are much less evolutionary conserved than canonical miRNAs. Due to the differences, canonical miRNA predictors are not applicable to mirtron prediction. Identification of differences is important for designing mirtron prediction algorithms and may help to improve the understanding of mirtron functioning. So far, only simple, single-feature comparisons were reported. These are insensitive to complex feature relations. We quantified miRNAs with 25 features and showed that it is impossible to distinguish the two miRNA species using simple thresholds on any single feature. However, when using the Principal Component Analysis mirtrons and canonical miRNAs are grouped separately. Moreover, several methodologically diverse machine learning classifiers delivered high classification performance. Using feature selection algorithms we found features (e.g. bulges in the stem region), previously reported divergent in two classes, that did not contribute to improving classification accuracy, which suggests that they are not biologically meaningful. Finally, we proposed a combination of the most important features (including Guanine content, hairpin free energy and hairpin length) which convey a specific pattern, crucial for identifying mirtrons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.