Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29765021›Full record

ArticleEmerging microbes & infections2018

Prospective surveillance for influenza. virus in Chinese swine farms.

Benjamin D Anderson, Mai-Juan Ma, Guo-Lin Wang, Zhen-Qiang Bi, Bing Lu, Xian-Jun Wang, Chuang-Xin Wang, Shan-Hui Chen, Yan-Hua Qian, Shao-Xia Song and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging microbes & infections, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review of genome sequencing technologies in molecular characterization of influenza A viruses in swine.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2022
    Article
  11. CAFOs, novel influenza, and the need for One Health approaches.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Chinese Public Attitudes towards, and Knowledge of, Animal Welfare.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. High Risk of Influenza Virus Infection Among Swine Workers: Examining a Dynamic Cohort in China.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Benjamin D AndersonDivision of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0051-5584
Mai-Juan MaState Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, 100071, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8105-462X
Guo-Lin WangState Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, 100071, Beijing, China.
Zhen-Qiang BiShandong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 250013, Jinan, China.
Bing LuWuxi Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 214023, Wuxi, China.
Xian-Jun WangShandong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 250013, Jinan, China.
Chuang-Xin WangLicheng District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 250199, Jinan, China.
Shan-Hui ChenWuxi Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 214023, Wuxi, China.
Yan-Hua QianWuxi Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 214023, Wuxi, China.
Shao-Xia SongShandong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 250013, Jinan, China.
Min LiLicheng District Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 250199, Jinan, China.
Teng ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, 100071, Beijing, China.
Meng-Na WuState Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, 100071, Beijing, China.
Laura K BorkenhagenDivision of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Wu-Chun CaoState Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity, Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, 100071, Beijing, China. caowc@bmi.ac.cn.
Gregory C GrayDivision of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. gregory.gray@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4628-5908
Institute of Microbiology · CNShandong Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNDuke University · US

Funding

Zoonotic Swine Influenza Virus Transmission in Confined Animal Feeding OperationsR01AI108993 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GRAY, GREGORY CHARLES · 2014 to 2018
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI108993
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pork production in China is rapidly increasing and swine production operations are expanding in size and number. However, the biosecurity measures necessary to prevent swine disease transmission, particularly influenza. viruses (IAV) that can be zoonotic, are often inadequate. Despite this risk, few studies have attempted to comprehensively study IAV ecology in swine production settings. Here, we present environmental and animal sampling data collected in the first year of an ongoing five-year prospective epidemiological study to assess IAV ecology as it relates to swine workers, their pigs, and the farm environment. From March 2015 to February 2016, we collected 396 each of environmental swab, water, bioaerosol, and fecal/slurry samples, as well as 3300 pig oral secretion samples from six farms in China. The specimens were tested with molecular assays for IAV. Of these, 46 (11.6%) environmental swab, 235 (7.1%) pig oral secretion, 23 (5.8%) water, 20 (5.1%) bioaerosol, and 19 (4.8%) fecal/slurry specimens were positive for influenza. by qRT-PCR. Risk factors for IAV detection among collected samples were identified using bivariate logistic regression. Overall, these first year data suggest that IAV is quite ubiquitous in the swine production environment and demonstrate an association between the different types of environmental sampling used. Given the mounting evidence that some of these viruses freely move between pigs and swine workers, and that mixing of these viruses can yield progeny viruses with pandemic potential, it seems imperative that routine surveillance for novel IAVs be conducted in commercial swine farms.

Indexed as

AnimalsChinaFarmsHumansInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza A Virus, H3N2 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsProspective StudiesSwineSwine Diseases

Identifiers

PMID29765021
PMCPMC5954049
OpenAlexW2804140918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.