Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29764407›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Are we doing enough to prevent poor-quality antimalarial medicines in the developing world?

Erin J Walker, Gregory M Peterson, James Grech, Evie Paragalli, Jackson Thomas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. How Do We Combat Bogus Medicines in the Age of the COVID-19 Pandemic?The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin J WalkerFaculty of Health, University of Canberra, Building 12, Room D36, Kirinari Street, Bruce, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Gregory M PetersonFaculty of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia.
James GrechFaculty of Health, University of Canberra, Building 12, Room D36, Kirinari Street, Bruce, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Evie ParagalliFaculty of Health, University of Canberra, Building 12, Room D36, Kirinari Street, Bruce, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.
Jackson ThomasFaculty of Health, University of Canberra, Building 12, Room D36, Kirinari Street, Bruce, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. Jackson.Thomas@canberra.edu.au.
University of Canberra · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria is a deadly parasitic disease that affects more than 3 billion people worldwide, in predominantly resource-poor countries. Despite malaria being preventable and treatable, a large number of adults and children, mostly in Africa, die from this disease each year. One contributor to needless morbidity and mortality is the production and distribution of poor-quality antimalarial medicines; indeed, it is estimated that over 122,000 deaths of children under 5 years of age in sub-Saharan countries were caused by poor-quality antimalarial medicines, in 2013 alone. DISCUSSION: Poor-quality medicines include those that are deliberately falsified for monetary gain and may contain incorrect amounts or even no active ingredients at all, as well as products that are inadequate due to poor compliance to conventional quality standards and medicines that have degraded over time. Across a number of studies it has been reported that 4-92% of antimalarials tested are poor quality. This represents a massive risk to the population subjected to the use of these medicines, in the form of more severe and prolonged illness, additional costs to individuals who already have very little money, and lack of confidence in treatments. The continuing circulation of poor-quality medicines results from a number of factors, including insufficient regulatory capacity in susceptible countries, inadequate funding to perform regulatory functions, poor coordination between regulatory authorities, and inefficient import/export control systems. To combat the distribution of poor-quality medicines a number of organisations have developed guidelines for the procurement of antimalarials, and programs to educate consumers about the risks of poor-quality medicines and incentivise retailers to identify and report falsified medicines. The development of new technologies to quickly identify poor-quality medicines in the field is also essential, and some significant advances have been made.

conclusionThere has been considerable improvement in the delivery of high-quality antimalarials to those who need them; however, there is still an urgent need for a collective response by the international community, political leaders, regulatory bodies, and pharmaceutical companies. This should include political commitment for enhanced research and development funding, such as for new innovative track-and-trace field devices, and international efforts to strengthen and harmonise drug regulation practices.

Indexed as

Counterfeit DrugsDeveloping CountriesDrug and Narcotic ControlAdultAfricaAntimalarialsChild MortalityChild, PreschoolHumansInfantMalariaAntimalarialsCounterfeit DrugsAntimalarialCounterfeitMalariaPoor-qualitySubstandard

Identifiers

PMID29764407
PMCPMC5952616
OpenAlexW2804677594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.