Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29764104›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2018

The Response to and Impact of the Ebola Epidemic: Towards an Agenda for Interdisciplinary Research.

Michael Calnan, Erica W Gadsby, Mandy Kader Kondé, Abdourahime Diallo, Jeremy S Rossman

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 69% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Viral Pandemics of the Last Four Decades: Pathophysiology, Health Impacts and Perspectives.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael CalnanSSPSSR, University of Kent, Kent, UK.
Erica W GadsbyCentre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Kent, UK.
Mandy Kader KondéDépartement Santé Publique, Université UGAN Conakry and FOSAD Health and Sustainable Development Foundation and CEFORPAG Center of Excellence for Training, Research on Malaria & Priority Diseases in Guinea, Conakry, Guinea.
Abdourahime DialloFOSAD Health and Sustainable Development Foundation and CEFORPAG Center of Excellence for Training, Research on Malaria & Priority Diseases in Guinea, Conakry, Guinea.
Jeremy S RossmanSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Kent, UK.
University of Kent · GBFondation Santé et Développement DurableGamal Abdel Nasser University of Conakry · GN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 2013-2016 Ebola virus disease (EVD) epidemic in West Africa was the largest in history and resulted in a huge public health burden and significant social and economic impact in those countries most affected. Its size, duration and geographical spread presents important opportunities for research than might help national and global health and social care systems to better prepare for and respond to future outbreaks. This paper examines research needs and research priorities from the perspective of those who directly experienced the EVD epidemic in Guinea.

methodsThe paper reports the findings from a research scoping exercise conducted in Guinea in 2017. This exercise explored the need for health and social care research, and identified research gaps, from the perspectives of different groups. Interviews were carried out with key stakeholders such as representatives of the Ministry of Health, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), academic and health service researchers and members of research ethics committees (N=15); health practitioners (N=12) and community representatives (N=11). Discussion groups were conducted with male and female EVD survivors (N=24) from two distinct communities.

resultsThis research scoping exercise identified seven key questions for further research. An important research priority that emerged during this study was the need to carry out a comprehensive analysis of the wider social, economic and political impact of the epidemic on the country, communities and survivors. The social and cultural dynamics of the epidemic and the local, national and international response to it need to be better understood. Many survivors and their relatives continue to experience stigma and social isolation and have a number of complex unmet needs. It is important to understand what sort of support they need, and how that might best be provided. A better understanding of the virus and the long-term health and social implications for survivors and non-infected survivors is also needed.

conclusionThis study identified a need and priority for interdisciplinary research focusing on the long-term sociocultural, economic and health impact of the EVD epidemic. Experiences of survivors and other non-infected members of the community still need to be explored but in this broader context.

Indexed as

Social ChangeAfrica, WesternEpidemicsFemaleHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaHumansInterdisciplinary ResearchMaleNeeds AssessmentQualitative ResearchSocioeconomic FactorsStakeholder ParticipationSurvivorsEbolaGuineaResearch PrioritiesSocial ImpactSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID29764104
PMCPMC5953523
OpenAlexW2762352386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.