Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29763706›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2018

Exploiting semantic patterns over biomedical knowledge graphs for predicting treatment and causative relations.

Gokhan Bakal, Preetham Talari, Elijah V Kakani, Ramakanth Kavuluru

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. How important is domain-specific language model pretraining and instruction finetuning for biomedical relation extraction?Natural language processing and information systems : ... International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems, NLDB ... revised papers. International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Info... · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Validation approaches for computational drug repurposing: a review.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. AnthraxKP: a knowledge graph-based, Anthrax Knowledge Portal mined from biomedical literature.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Knowledge-Based Biomedical Data Science.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gokhan BakalDepartment of Computer Science, University of Kentucky, United States. Electronic address: mgokhanbakal@uky.edu.
Preetham TalariDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, United States. Electronic address: preetham.talari@uky.edu.
Elijah V KakaniDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, United States. Electronic address: elijah.kakani@uky.edu.
Ramakanth KavuluruDivision of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, United States; Department of Computer Science, University of Kentucky, United States. Electronic address: ramakanth.kavuluru@uky.edu.

Funding

University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KATHLEEN L. O'CONNOR · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
Kentucky Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001998 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HARTMANN, KATHERINE E, KERN, PHILIP A · 2016 to 2025
$34.2M
From Syntactic Relations to Semantic Predications: Porting Open Information Extraction to BiomedicineR21LM012274 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI KAVULURU, VENKATA NAGA RAMAKANTH · 2016 to 2017
$374k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001998NCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558NLM NIH HHS R21 LM012274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying new potential treatment options for medical conditions that cause human disease burden is a central task of biomedical research. Since all candidate drugs cannot be tested with animal and clinical trials, in vitro approaches are first attempted to identify promising candidates. Likewise, identifying different causal relations between biomedical entities is also critical to understand biomedical processes. Generally, natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning are used to predict specific relations between any given pair of entities using the distant supervision approach.

objectiveTo build high accuracy supervised predictive models to predict previously unknown treatment and causative relations between biomedical entities based only on semantic graph pattern features extracted from biomedical knowledge graphs.

methodsWe used 7000 treats and 2918 causes hand-curated relations from the UMLS Metathesaurus to train and test our models. Our graph pattern features are extracted from simple paths connecting biomedical entities in the SemMedDB graph (based on the well-known SemMedDB database made available by the U.S. National Library of Medicine). Using these graph patterns connecting biomedical entities as features of logistic regression and decision tree models, we computed mean performance measures (precision, recall, F-score) over 100 distinct 80-20% train-test splits of the datasets. For all experiments, we used a positive:negative class imbalance of 1:10 in the test set to model relatively more realistic scenarios.

resultsOur models predict treats and causes relations with high F-scores of 99% and 90% respectively. Logistic regression model coefficients also help us identify highly discriminative patterns that have an intuitive interpretation. We are also able to predict some new plausible relations based on false positives that our models scored highly based on our collaborations with two physician co-authors. Finally, our decision tree models are able to retrieve over 50% of treatment relations from a recently created external dataset.

conclusionsWe employed semantic graph patterns connecting pairs of candidate biomedical entities in a knowledge graph as features to predict treatment/causative relations between them. We provide what we believe is the first evidence in direct prediction of biomedical relations based on graph features. Our work complements lexical pattern based approaches in that the graph patterns can be used as additional features for weakly supervised relation prediction.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingPattern Recognition, AutomatedSemanticsAlgorithmsBiomedical ResearchDatabases, FactualDecision TreesDrug RepositioningHumansKnowledgeMachine LearningMedical InformaticsProbabilityRegression AnalysisUnified Medical Language SystemVocabulary, ControlledInformation extractionRelation predictionSemantic graph patterns

Identifiers

PMID29763706
PMCPMC6070294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.