Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29761486›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of dermatology2019

TREatment of ATopic eczema (TREAT) Registry Taskforce: an international Delphi exercise to identify a core set of domains and domain items for national atopic eczema photo- and systemic therapy registries.

L A A Gerbens, C J Apfelbacher, A D Irvine, S Barbarot, R J de Booij, A E Boyce, M Deleuran, L F Eichenfield, M H Hof, M A Middelkamp-Hup and 9 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of dermatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03621137 (TREAT NL), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03621137 recruitingnot on this map

TREAT NL (TREatment of ATopic Eczema, the Netherlands) Registry

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAcademisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)Ran2017 to 2027Enrolled500ConditionsModerate-to-severe Atopic EczemaArmsNo study-specific intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 11 institutions in 7 countries.

L A A GerbensDepartment of Dermatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5244-5058
C J ApfelbacherMedical Sociology, Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3805-8219
A D IrvineDepartment of Paediatric Dermatology, Our Lady's Children's Hospital, Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-9048-2044
S BarbarotDepartment of Dermatology, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6629-9100
R J de BooijContributing patient.
A E BoyceUnit for Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, U.K.
M DeleuranDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
L F EichenfieldDepartments of Dermatology and Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
M H HofDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Bioinformatics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M A Middelkamp-HupDepartment of Dermatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
A RobertsContributing patient.
J SchmittCenter for Evidence-based Healthcare, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0264-0960
C VestergaardDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
D WallDepartment of Paediatric Dermatology, Our Lady's Children's Hospital, Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland.
S WeidingerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
P R WilliamsonMRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, U.K.
C FlohrUnit for Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-4884-6286
P I SpulsDepartment of Dermatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6035-2863
international TREAT Registry Taskforce
Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NLAarhus University Hospital · DKKing's College London · GBCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRChildren's Health Ireland at Crumlin · IETrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence of immunomodulatory therapies to guide clinical management of atopic eczema (AE) is scarce, despite frequent and often off-label use. Patient registries provide valuable evidence for the effects of treatments under real-world conditions that can inform treatment guidelines, give the opportunity for health economic evaluation and the evaluation of quality of care, as well as pharmacogenetic and dynamic research, which cannot be adequately addressed in clinical trials.

objectivesThe TREatment of ATopic eczema (TREAT) Registry Taskforce aims to seek international consensus on a core set of domains and items ('what to measure') for AE research registries, using a Delphi approach.

methodsParticipants from six stakeholder groups were included: doctors, nurses, nonclinical researchers, patients, industry and regulatory body representatives. The eDelphi comprised three sequential online rounds, requesting participants to rate the importance of each proposed domain item. Participants could add domain items to the proposed list in round 1. A final consensus meeting was held to ratify the core set.

resultsParticipants (n = 479) from 36 countries accessed the eDelphi platform, of whom 86%, 79% and 74% completed rounds 1, 2 and 3, respectively. At the face-to-face consensus meeting attended by 42 participants the final core set was established containing 19 domains with 69 domain items (49 baseline and 20 follow-up items).

conclusionsThis core set of domains and items to be captured by national AE systemic therapy registries will standardize data collection and thereby allow direct comparability across registries and facilitate data pooling between countries. Ultimately, it will provide greater insight into the effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of photo- and systemic immunomodulatory therapies.

Indexed as

Advisory CommitteesInternational CooperationConsensusDelphi TechniqueDermatitis, AtopicHumansImmunologic FactorsPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsRegistriesStakeholder ParticipationTreatment OutcomeImmunologic FactorsPhotosensitizing Agents

Identifiers

PMID29761486
PMCPMC7379963
OpenAlexW2804940047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.