Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29761456›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2018

PomBase: The Scientific Resource for Fission Yeast.

Antonia Lock, Kim Rutherford, Midori A Harris, Valerie Wood

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Identification and characterization ofmicroPublication biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Online Databases in Circular RNAs.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Isolation of mutant alleles of the U6 snRNA mmicroPublication biology · 2023
    Article
  16. The importance of being the HGNC.Human genomics · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Antonia LockDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK.
Kim RutherfordDepartment of Biochemistry, Cambridge Systems Biology Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Midori A HarrisDepartment of Biochemistry, Cambridge Systems Biology Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Valerie WoodDepartment of Biochemistry, Cambridge Systems Biology Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. vw253@cam.ac.uk.

Funding

Resource ProjectU41HG002273 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI THOMAS, PAUL D. · 2012 to 2021
$34.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG002273Wellcome Trust 104967Wellcome Trust 104967/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe has become well established as a model species for studying conserved cell-level biological processes, especially the mechanics and regulation of cell division. PomBase integrates the S. pombe genome sequence with traditional genetic, molecular, and cell biological experimental data as well as the growing body of large datasets generated by emerging high-throughput methods. This chapter provides insight into the curation philosophy and data organization at PomBase, and provides a guide to using PomBase for infrequent visitors and anyone considering exploring S. pombe in their research.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticComputational BiologyGene OntologyGenome, FungalGenomicsMolecular Sequence AnnotationSchizosaccharomycesSoftwareWeb BrowserAnnotation extensionsBiological databaseFission yeastGene ontologyGO slimModel organismSchizosaccharomyces pombe

Identifiers

PMID29761456
PMCPMC6440643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.