ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2018
Predictors of self-reported adherence to direct oral anticoagulation in a population of elderly men and women with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adherence and persistence with direct oral anticoagulants by dose regimen: A systematic review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Medication adherence to rivaroxaban and dabigatran in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2020Pooled it
- Prevalence of adherence and its impact on quality of life in oral anticoagulant users in Egypt: A cross-sectional study from two Egyptian university hospitals.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Management of Patients Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Clinical Practice and Challenging Scenarios.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Direct oral anticoagulants: patient reported adherence and minor bleedings.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2023Article
- Adherence to Antithrombotic Therapy for Patients Attending a Multidisciplinary Thrombosis Service in Canada - A Cross-Sectional Survey.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Article
- Factors Associated with Anticoagulation Adherence in Chinese Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.Patient preference and adherence · 2021Article
- High Mortality Rates Among Patients With Non-Traumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Atrial Fibrillation on Antithrombotic Therapy Are Independent of the Presence of Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: Insights From a Population-Based Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
- Article
- Patterns in anticoagulant utilization in the Czech Republic during 2007-2017.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is a general lack of studies evaluating medication adherence with self-report scales for elderly patients in treatment with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The aim of the study was to assess the degree of adherence to DOAC therapy in a population of elderly outpatients aged 65 years or older affected by non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), using the 4-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, and to identify potential factors, including the geriatric multidimensional evaluation, which can affect adherence in the study population. A total of 103 subjects, anticoagulated with DOACs for NVAF in primary or secondary prevention, were eligible; 76 showed adequate adhesion to anticoagulant therapy, while 27 showed inadequate adherence. Participants underwent biochemical assessment and Morisky Scale, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, CHA2DS2-VASc, HAS-BLED, mental status and nutritional evaluations were performed. 2% of subjects assumed Dabigatran at low dose, while 7.8% at standard dose, 9.7% assumed low-dose of Rivaroxaban and 30.1% at standard dose, 6.8% assumed Apixaban at low dose and 39.7% at standard dose, and finally 1% assumed Edoxaban at low dose and 2.9% at standard dose. Most subjects took the DOACs without help (80.6%), while 16 subjects were helped by a family member (15.5%) and 4 were assisted by a caregiver (3.9%). Binary logistic regression considered inappropriate adherence as a dependent variable, while age, male sex, polypharmacotherapy, cognitive decay, caregiver help for therapy assumption, duration of DOAC therapy and double daily administration were considered as independent variables. The double daily administration was an independent factor, determining inappropriate adherence with an OR of 2.88 (p = 0.048, CI 1.003-8.286).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.