Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29761268›Full record

ArticlePlant molecular biology2018

Towards a comprehensive picture of C-to-U RNA editing sites in angiosperm mitochondria.

Alejandro A Edera, Carolina L Gandini, M Virginia Sanchez-Puerta

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plant molecular biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 186 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exploring the Mitochondrial Genomes ofEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Assembly and Characterization of the Complete Mitochondrial Genome ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comparative mitochondrial genomics of cultivatedFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Newly assembled mitochondrial genomes ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alejandro A EderaIBAM, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, M5528AHB, Chacras de Coria, Argentina. aedera@mendoza-conicet.gob.ar.
Carolina L GandiniIBAM, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, M5528AHB, Chacras de Coria, Argentina.
M Virginia Sanchez-PuertaIBAM, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, CONICET, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, M5528AHB, Chacras de Coria, Argentina.
Universidad Nacional de Cuyo · ARConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageOur understanding of the dynamic and evolution of RNA editing in angiosperms is in part limited by the few editing sites identified to date. This study identified 10,217 editing sites from 17 diverse angiosperms. Our analyses confirmed the universality of certain features of RNA editing, and offer new evidence behind the loss of editing sites in angiosperms. RNA editing is a post-transcriptional process that substitutes cytidines (C) for uridines (U) in organellar transcripts of angiosperms. These substitutions mostly take place in mitochondrial messenger RNAs at specific positions called editing sites. By means of publicly available RNA-seq data, this study identified 10,217 editing sites in mitochondrial protein-coding genes of 17 diverse angiosperms. Even though other types of mismatches were also identified, we did not find evidence of non-canonical editing processes. The results showed an uneven distribution of editing sites among species, genes, and codon positions. The analyses revealed that editing sites were conserved across angiosperms but there were some species-specific sites. Non-synonymous editing sites were particularly highly conserved (~ 80%) across the plant species and were efficiently edited (80% editing extent). In contrast, editing sites at third codon positions were poorly conserved (~ 30%) and only partially edited (~ 40% editing extent). We found that the loss of editing sites along angiosperm evolution is mainly occurring by replacing editing sites with thymidines, instead of a degradation of the editing recognition motif around editing sites. Consecutive and highly conserved editing sites had been replaced by thymidines as result of retroprocessing, by which edited transcripts are reverse transcribed to cDNA and then integrated into the genome by homologous recombination. This phenomenon was more pronounced in eudicots, and in the gene cox1. These results suggest that retroprocessing is a widespread driving force underlying the loss of editing sites in angiosperm mitochondria.

Indexed as

RNA EditingBase Pair MismatchCodonGenes, PlantGenome, MitochondrialMagnoliopsidaMitochondriaPhylogenyThymidineTranscriptomeCodonThymidineAngiospermMitochondrial genomeRetroprocessingRNA editing

Identifiers

PMID29761268
OpenAlexW2804249826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.