Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29761247›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular biochemistry2018

Beneficial effects of fenofibrate in pulmonary hypertension in rats.

Palak Galhotra, Pankaj Prabhakar, Himanshu Meghwani, Soheb A Mohammed, Sanjay Kumar Banerjee, Sandeep Seth, Milind P Hote, K H Reeta, Ruma Ray, Subir Kumar Maulik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Signaling pathways and targeted therapy for pulmonary hypertension.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Review
  3. Network module-based drug repositioning for pulmonary arterial hypertension.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Palak GalhotraDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Room No. 4017, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Pankaj PrabhakarDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Room No. 4017, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Himanshu MeghwaniDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Room No. 4017, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Soheb A MohammedDepartment of Drug Discovery Research Center (DDRC), Translational Health Science and Technology Institute (THSTI), Faridabad, Haryana, 121001, India.
Sanjay Kumar BanerjeeDepartment of Drug Discovery Research Center (DDRC), Translational Health Science and Technology Institute (THSTI), Faridabad, Haryana, 121001, India.
Sandeep SethDepartment of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, 110029, India.
Milind P HoteDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, 110029, India.
K H ReetaDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Room No. 4017, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Ruma RayDepartment of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, 110029, India.
Subir Kumar MaulikDepartment of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Room No. 4017, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India. skmaulik@gmail.com.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INTranslational Health Science and Technology Institute · IN

Funding

Indian Council of Medical Research 5/4/1-22/13-NCD-II
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a morbid complication of cardiopulmonary as well as several systemic diseases in humans. It is rapidly progressive and fatal if left untreated. In the present study, we investigated the effect of PPARα agonist fenofibrate (FF) on monocrotaline (MCT)-induced PH in rats. FF, because of its pleiotropic property, could be helpful in reducing inflammation, oxidative stress, and reactive oxygen species. On day 1, MCT (50 mg/kg, s.c.) was given to all the rats in MCT, sildenafil, and FF group except normal control rats. After 3 days of giving MCT, sildenafil (175 µg/kg, orally) and FF (120 mg/kg, orally) were given for 25 days. Echocardiography, hemodynamic parameters, fulton's index, histopathology, oxidative stress parameters, inflammatory markers, Bcl2/Bax gene expression ratio in the right ventricle, and protein expression for NOX-1 in lungs were studied in all the groups. FF has shown to prevent decrease in ratio of pulmonary artery acceleration time to ejection time, increase in ratio of right ventricular outflow tract dimension to aortic outflow dimension, rise in right ventricular systolic pressure, right ventricular hypertrophy, increase in the percentage medial wall thickness (%MWT), increase in oxidative stress and inflammation, increase in NADPH oxidase-1 (NOX-1) expression, and decrease in mRNA expression of Bcl2/Bax ratio caused by MCT. To conclude, FF prevented MCT-induced PH in rats by various mechanisms. It might be helpful in preventing PH in patients who are likely to develop PH.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleFenofibrateHypertension, PulmonaryInflammationMonocrotalineOxidative StressRatsRats, WistarFenofibrateMonocrotalineInflammationMonocrotalineOxidative stressPPAR α agonist

Identifiers

PMID29761247
OpenAlexW2804402820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.