Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29761156›Full record

ReviewNPJ Parkinson's disease2018

Viewpoint and practical recommendations from a movement disorder specialist panel on objective measurement in the clinical management of Parkinson's disease.

Per Odin, K Ray Chaudhuri, Jens Volkmann, Angelo Antonini, Alexander Storch, Espen Dietrichs, Zvezdan Pirtošek, Tove Henriksen, Malcolm Horne, David Devos and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ Parkinson's disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Clinical correlates of movement disorders in adult Niemann-Pick type C patients measured via a Personal KinetiGraph.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Do neuropsychiatric fluctuations temporally match motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease?Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 9 countries.

Per Odin *1University of Lund, Lund, Sweden.
K Ray Chaudhuri *3National Parkinson Foundation (NPF) International Centre of Excellence, Department of Neurology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Jens Volkmann5Department of Neurology, University Clinic of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Angelo Antonini6Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Alexander Storch7Department of Neurology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Espen Dietrichs8Department of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Zvezdan Pirtošek9Department of Neurology, University Medical Center, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tove Henriksen10University Hospital of Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Malcolm Horne11Centre for Clinical Neurosciences and Neurological Research, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
David DevosDepartment of Medical Pharmacology, Lille University, INSERM UMRS_1171, University Hospital Center, LICEND COEN Center, Lille, France.
Filip Bergquist14Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Bispebjerg Hospital · DKKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBKlinikum Bremerhaven-Reinkenheide · DELjubljana University Medical Centre · SIOslo University Hospital · NOSt Vincent's Hospital · AUUniversité de Lille · FRUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor aspects of Parkinson's disease, such as fluctuations and dyskinesia, can be reliably evaluated using a variety of "wearable" technologies, but practical guidance on objective measurement (OM) and the optimum use of these devices is lacking. Therefore, as a first step, a panel of movement disorder specialists met to provide guidance on how OM could be assessed and incorporated into clinical guidelines. A key aspect of the incorporation of OM into the management of Parkinson's disease (PD) is defining cutoff values that separate "controlled" from "uncontrolled" symptoms that can be modified by therapy and that relate to an outcome that is relevant to the person with PD (such as quality of life). Defining cutoffs by consensus, which can be subsequently tested and refined, is the first step to optimizing OM in the management of PD. OM should be used by all clinicians that treat people with PD but the least experienced may find the most value, but this requires guidance from experts to allow non-experts to apply guidelines. While evidence is gained for devices that produce OM, expert opinion is needed to supplement the evidence base.

Identifiers

PMID29761156
PMCPMC5945844
OpenAlexW2799416990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.