Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29761107›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2018

Intramolecular Fuzzy Interactions Involving Intrinsically Disordered Domains.

Miguel Arbesú, Guillermo Iruela, Héctor Fuentes, João M C Teixeira, Miquel Pons

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Isoform-specific C-terminal phosphorylation drives autoinhibition of Casein kinase 1.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. AlphaFold2: A Role for Disordered Protein/Region Prediction?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miguel ArbesúBioNMR Laboratory, Inorganic and Organic Chemistry Department, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Guillermo IruelaBioNMR Laboratory, Inorganic and Organic Chemistry Department, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Héctor FuentesBioNMR Laboratory, Inorganic and Organic Chemistry Department, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
João M C TeixeiraBioNMR Laboratory, Inorganic and Organic Chemistry Department, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Miquel PonsBioNMR Laboratory, Inorganic and Organic Chemistry Department, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural disorder is an essential ingredient for function in many proteins and protein complexes. Fuzzy complexes describe the many instances where disorder is maintained as a critical element of protein interactions. In this minireview we discuss how intramolecular fuzzy interactions function in signaling complexes. Focussing on the Src family of kinases, we argue that the intrinsically disordered domains that are unique for each of the family members and display a clear fingerprint of long range interactions in Src, might have critical roles as functional sensor or effectors and mediate allosteric communication via fuzzy interactions.

Indexed as

allosteryfuzzy complexesfuzzy domainsintrinsically disordered proteinsparamagnetic relaxation enhancementSrc family kinases

Identifiers

PMID29761107
PMCPMC5936776
OpenAlexW2801336071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.