Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29761095›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2018

An "All Teach, All Learn" Approach to Research Capacity Strengthening in Indigenous Primary Health Care Continuous Quality Improvement.

Karen McPhail-Bell, Veronica Matthews, Roxanne Bainbridge, Michelle Louise Redman-MacLaren, Deborah Askew, Shanthi Ramanathan, Jodie Bailie, Ross Bailie, Centre RCS Lead Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Karen McPhail-BellPoche Centre for Indigenous Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Veronica MatthewsUniversity Centre for Rural Health, The University of Sydney, Lismore, NSW, Australia.
Roxanne BainbridgeCentre for Indigenous Health Equity Research, CQUniversity, Cairns, QLD, Australia.
Michelle Louise Redman-MacLarenCentre for Indigenous Health Equity Research, CQUniversity, Cairns, QLD, Australia.
Deborah AskewPrimary Care Clinical Unit, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Shanthi RamanathanHunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Jodie BailieUniversity Centre for Rural Health, The University of Sydney, Lismore, NSW, Australia.
Ross BailieUniversity Centre for Rural Health, The University of Sydney, Lismore, NSW, Australia.
Centre RCS Lead Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Australia, Indigenous people experience poor access to health care and the highest rates of morbidity and mortality of any population group. Despite modest improvements in recent years, concerns remains that Indigenous people have been over-researched without corresponding health improvements. Embedding Indigenous leadership, participation, and priorities in health research is an essential strategy for meaningful change for Indigenous people. To centralize Indigenous perspectives in research processes, a transformative shift away from traditional approaches that have benefited researchers and non-Indigenous agendas is required. This shift must involve concomitant strengthening of the research capacity of Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers and research translators-all must teach and all must learn. However, there is limited evidence about how to strengthen systems and stakeholder capacity to participate in and lead continuous quality improvement (CQI) research in Indigenous primary health care, to the benefit of Indigenous people. This paper describes the collaborative development of, and principles underpinning, a research capacity strengthening (RCS) model in a national Indigenous primary health care CQI research network. The development process identified the need to address power imbalances, cultural contexts, relationships, systems requirements and existing knowledge, skills, and experience of all parties. Taking a strengths-based perspective, we harnessed existing knowledge, skills and experiences; hence our emphasis on capacity "strengthening". New insights are provided into the complex processes of RCS within the context of CQI in Indigenous primary health care.

Indexed as

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander healthcollaborative leadershipcontinuous quality improvementIndigenous healthIndigenous leadershipprimary health-care servicesresearch capacity strengtheningresearch translation

Identifiers

PMID29761095
PMCPMC5936797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.