ArticleBrain and behavior2018
Behavioral and neurophysiological abnormalities during cued continuous performance tasks in patients with mild traumatic brain injury.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the Hit: The Hidden Costs of Repetitive Head Trauma.Neuroscience insights · 2025Review
- Weighted Coherence Analysis as a Window into the Neurophysiological Effects of Traumatic Brain Injury.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Verbal retrieval deficits due to traumatic brain injury are associated with changes in event related potentials during a Go-NoGo task.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Sustained attention performance deficits in the three-choice serial reaction time task in male and female rats after experimental brain trauma.Brain research · 2023Article
- Neural activity during response inhibition in mild traumatic brain injury and posttraumatic stress disorder.Neurobiology of stress · 2021Article
- Joint analysis of frontal theta synchrony and white matter following mild traumatic brain injury.Brain imaging and behavior · 2020Article
- N2b Reflects the Cognitive Changes in Executive Functioning After Concussion: A Scoping Review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Behavioral and neurophysiological abnormalities during cued continuous performance tasks in patients with mild traumatic brain injury.Brain and behavior · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study's aim was to investigate the features and neural mechanisms of sustained attention in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) by comparing and analyzing neuropsychological, behavioral, event-related potentials, and event-related desynchronization and synchronization between mTBI patients and healthy controls. Methods: Twenty mTBI patients with mTBI and 20 healthy controls underwent the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and a cued continuous performance task (AX-CPT). Neuropsychological, behavioral, and electroencephalogram (EEG) data were collected and analyzed. Results: There were significant differences between the mTBI group and the control group in their MMSE total scores, attention, and calculation, but there were no significant differences in orientation, memory, recall, and verbal scores. There were significant differences between the mTBI group and the control group in hitting the number, reaction time, and the number of errors of omission, but there were no significant differences in the number of false errors. The amplitude of Go-N2 and Nogo-N2 was significantly smaller for the mTBI group than that for the control group. The amplitude of Go-P3 was significantly smaller for the mTBI group than that for the control group, but not for the amplitude of Nogo-P3. The Go-αERS were significantly less for the mTBI group than for the control group during the 0-200 ms after the stimulus onset. The Go-αERD and Nogo-αERD were significantly less for the mTBI group than for the control group during the 600-1,000 ms after the stimulus onset. The Go-βERS were significantly less for the mTBI group than for the control group during the 200-400 ms after the stimulus onset. There were no significant differences in the Nogo-αERS and Nogo-βERD/ERS between the mTBI group and the control group. Conclusion: Patients with mTBI exhibited impairments in sustained attention and conflict monitoring, while response inhibition may have been spared.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.